In-house designs : MG EX-E

MG’s future hot-shot

Left to right: Richard Hamblin, Roy Axe and Gordon Sked with their creation: the EX-E

Left to right: Richard Hamblin, Roy Axe and Gordon Sked with their creation: the EX-E

First shown to the world at the 1985 Frankfurt motor show, it is fair to say that the MG EX-E shocked visitors simply because it was so attractive and so unexpected. At the time of the EX-E’s debut, MG could only offer the “M” cars – sporting saloons and hatchbacks – so it came as a pleasant surprise to note that the company was still interested in the idea of designing and producing sports cars.

The EX-E’s frontal design and glasshouse meant it bore a striking resemblance to the previous year’s Honda HP-X concept, styled by Pininfarina.

The story of the MG EX-E in Roy Axe’s own words:

From this point I felt that I should really pressure to create and show a true show car for the international show circuit. The Rover 800 was running into timing difficulties due to quality issues and there was nothing happening otherwise than the less than exciting introduction of the Maestro and Montego.

I felt that the company needed a shot in the arm, something that would excite the press and create copy world wide, something unexpected. I also needed something to say to the design fraternity that ARG had a new design operation that could compete world wide, this in order to attract the quality of new people I needed for the work in hand.

I owned a Ferrari 308GT at the time and felt that a sports car of this type updating the Ferrari and showing that England was just as capable of producing a car with world wide appeal, would do the trick. Marketing were against the idea as ARG did not make such cars and that it would prove to be a sales distraction.

Harold Musgrove was enthusiastic but also was aware of the marketing position and felt the project had to many downsides to go ahead as a full project. After discussions, however, it was agreed that we should proceed with the design aiming for the Geneva show of 1984 as a target. The model was to be made more credible by creating a chassis and mechanical spec to compliment the styling and the engine chosen was the one being developed for the Metro rally car.

Spen King from the Gaydon experimental department was brought in to work out the chassis details and we in design worked with Spen to develop a proposal.

The mechnical make-up of the car was also interesting, in that it used a detuned version of the MG Metro 6R4's power plant mounted amidships.

The mechnical make-up of the car was also interesting, in that it used a detuned version of the MG Metro 6R4’s power plant mounted amidships.

Up to that point I did not really know Spen but had been an admirer from afar so to speak. Spen was and is a man with very strong opinions and I think it is fair to say so have I! As a result some vigorous discussions took place as we battled for a package that would retain the drama of the intent to produce a show car of world class. I enjoyed working with Spen and it was a real regret on my part that the opportunity to do much more with him did not arise again other than the use of the small car body design on the ECV.

Styling was striking, but also very attractive and was credited to Gerry McGovern, working under Roy Axe. Interestingly, many people have made subsequent comparisons between the MG EX-E of 1985 and the Honda NSX of 1989 and the parallels are there for all to see.

Styling was striking, but also very attractive and was credited to Gerry McGovern, working under Roy Axe. Interestingly, many people have made subsequent comparisons between the MG EX-E of 1985 and the Honda NSX of 1989 and the parallels are there for all to see.

The visual goal was for a sports GT of generally Ferrari 308 size and proportions but with a totally unique look . We decided that the MG name was the only appropriate one to use and that E followed F as a logical type name. I am an aircraft enthusiast and a follower of military aircraft style, if that is the right term. I was very impressed by the F16 Falcon fighter with its command pilot position and surrounding bubble canopy and this was the inspiration I gave to the design team. The design manager for the exterior of the project was Gordon Sked and the small team of designers included some new college grads and Gerry McGovern who was new to the company having joined from Peugeot. Gerry had been hired by me directly from school as something of an experiment years earlier at Chrysler UK.

The project started well then got bogged down as such projects often do. I remember one weekend morning getting the team together and thrashing out some of the forms. The form had become heavy and I felt it should take a cue from the 308 and have the bonnet surface be below the wings creating a lighter look and the great view forward from the cockpit that I so admired in the Ferrari.
The problems were sorted out and the form that eventually became the final model emerged in the three dimensional development.

The interior was led by Richard Hamblin and here we were after a totally unique and high tech look to reflect the new technology that was emerging but at the same time keeping a theme of sports car driver involvement. Heads up displays and computer readouts were incorporated.

The interior was led by Richard Hamblin and here we were after a totally unique and high tech look to reflect the new technology that was emerging but at the same time keeping a theme of sports car driver involvement. Heads up displays and computer readouts were incorporated.

The final sketches used in the publicity covering the design process were, in fact, produced after the event as it were. Gerry McGovern was involved in the project and did those final sketches but in fairness to the others he was not the sole designer, it was a team effort.

The model was cast in fibreglass and painted and it looked fantastic. There was still the resistance to showing it until I unveiled the final finished model to Harold Musgrove. He was convinced and with just a few days to the show opening at Frankfurt, he instructed that the model would be shown.

The results are there to see by referring to the press reports of the time. The car received a wonderful reception and ARG was the subject of much speculation for the future.

The show model is still around and when I last saw it at the Gaydon museum I felt a great deal of personal satisfaction for the design which has, I feel, stood the test of time well and would not look out of place if introduced today, though this is I admit, a very biased opinion!

Keith Adams

About the Author:

Created www.austin-rover.co.uk in 2001 and built it to become the world's foremost reference source for all things BMC, Leyland and Rover Group, before renaming it AROnline in 2007. Is the Editor of the Parkers website and price guide, formerly editor of Classic Car Weekly, and launch editor/creator of Modern Clsssics magazine. Has contributed to various motoring titles including Octane, Practical Classics, Evo, Honest John, CAR magazine, Autocar, Pistonheads, Diesel Car, Practical Performance Car, Performance French Car, Car Mechanics, Jaguar World Monthly, MG Enthusiast, Modern MINI, Practical Classics, Fifth Gear Website, Radio 4, and the the Motoring Independent... Likes 'conditionally challenged' motors and taking them on unfeasable adventures all across Europe.

8 Comments on "In-house designs : MG EX-E"

Trackback | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Landyboy says:

    I always wonder if the EX-E influenced Honda in the development of the NSX and if an MG badged mid-engined car using a transverse V6 might have enjoyed greater sales success than the NSX.

  2. Smiler says:

    A fantastic looking car. Considering the choice of power-plant and the cars layout and styling, am I the only one who can see similarities with the later Jaguar XJ220?

  3. David says:

    Clearly a massive influence on the MGF from the rear and side – looking at the taillights and the shape of the side windows.

  4. Phil Simpson says:

    Still looks fresh now. Quite a few touches went into the F.

  5. Will M says:

    Hints of XJ220, Corvette, MGF about it.

    With a 6R4 engine and possibly getting Reliant to produce the fibreglass body, could it have been put into production?

  6. alex scott says:

    the MG 6R4 engine WAS used in the XJ220 was it not….which is probably another reaosn the above car didnt go into production – too much competition in one company other than that it looks great even by todays standards 🙂 alex

  7. Nate says:

    Alex Scott

    They could have used a NA version of the Rover V6 with roughly the same displacement / power as the similar Honda NSX (maybe even more along with a single-turbo version) that could have been used in other Rover Group cars or even install the stillborn 306 bhp 3.6 KV8 engine had the MG EX-E gone into production, neither of which would have really threatened the 542 bhp twin-turbo Jaguar XJ220.

  8. Tony burton says:

    Just a little extra info….
    I worked in product planning at the time and Roy asked me if he could borrow my lotus esprit for a couple of days to use as a dimensional reference model. He kept it over 2 months and it came back with blobs of clay here and there.

Have your say...