In memoriam : Alfa Romeo Arna

Keith Adams

The first in a series of features about extinct cars in the UK, according to data supplied by the brilliant How Many Left? website based on DVLA data.

1: Alfa Romeo Arna – died out in 2007

Alfa Romeo ARNA

Alfa Romeo Arna

Motor industry commentators often cite the Alfa Romeo Arna as a perfect example of how not to combine the talents of two manufacturers. The world sat up and took notice when Alfa Romeo announced its forthcoming partnership with Nissan in October 1980 – the combination of the two had the potential to build something special.

The Italian company had – during its post-war history – produced some of the world’s finest accessibly priced drivers’ cars, but many of them had been prone to succumb to rust and unreliability. The Japanese, on the other hand, understood marketing like no other and could build family hold-alls with Swiss watch-like mechanical precision in their millions. What rival manufacturers feared was that the Italian Government-sponsored partnership between Nissan and Alfa Romeo was about to start making Italian-designed cars built to Japanese production tolerances.

Imagine, then, the sighs of relief from Longbridge, Wolfsburg and Viry-Chatillon, when the Arna (for Alfa Romeo Nissan Autoveicoli) started rolling off the line at Pratola Serra, Italy for a world debut at the 1983 Frankfurt Motor Show. What Alfa Romeo needed was an exciting ‘Sud replacement (in lieu of the fact the 33 had taken a step upmarket, leaving a vacuum below) but, instead, we were presented with a lightly restyled Nissan N12 Cherry/Pulsar.

Under the bonnet, it wasn’t all bad news, because there was a range of 1.2-, 1.3- and 1.5-litre ex-Alfasud flat-fours, guaranteeing eager performance. Unfortunately, the suspension set-up – the ‘Sud’s strongest point – was diluted. Disastrously… The front was a ‘Sud carry-over and the rear came straight from the Cherry/Pulsar. The body and dashboard were also Japanese, being shipped over from Japan – and alongside the tidy ItalDesign 33, it was a huge disappointment visually.

Thankfully, it retained Italian electrics. Well, when we say thankfully, we mean disastrously…

The Arna arrived in the UK at the end of 1983 but was actually sold as the Nissan Cherry Europe and that had Nissan buyers asking the obvious question – why buy an Italian-built Japanese car, when I can have a Japanese one instead? It bombed. In 1985, Alfa Romeo started importing them, selling the Arna through its own Dealer Network and, er, it bombed – not, though, before Autocar had tested the 1.5-litre Ti version, favourably comparing it with the Alfasud Ti of old.

That’s, in essence, the story of the Arna. The car wasn’t actually as bad as journos these days like to say it was but - and this is the important bit – it wasn’t good enough. Alfa buyers saw it as a Japanese car and Nissan buyers saw it the other way. In short, it was a car that no one wanted in the UK. In Europe, it fared slightly better and, in its four-year existence, the Arna sold just over 53,000. Mind you, to put that into perspective, the Triumph Acclaim did rather better (and it was a very similar concept), with 133,000 sold in a similarly brief run.

Fiat Group bought out Alfa Romeo in 1986, saving it in the process. The Nissan deal was brought to a swift end and the Arna was quickly forgotten. However, it was a warning for the future – globalisation was here to stay, but to do it properly, play on the strengths of the partners, not their weaknesses. One only needs to look at the Rover R8 200/400 to see what can be achieved.

Alfa Romeo ARNA

Alfa Romeo Arna

Nissan Cherry Europe

Sister car (in marketing terms) to the Arna, the Nissan Cherry Europe. It was sold here before the Arna, as this UK press shot shows – luckily there are two of these left in the UK...



58 Responses

  1. Jonathan Carling Jonathan Carling - June 19, 2011

    The Alfa Romeo Arna was, as you say, not as bad as its made out to be nowadays. I recall CAR testing an Arna in the mid-80s and concluding that the best thing to say was that ‘the Italian parts seem to be in the majority’. I’m wondering how true that was?

    Actually, the Arna reminds me a bit of the CityRover in that it was probably the best Alfa could do on the resources available at the time (ditto Alfa 6 and Alfa 90 from the same period). That just shows how badly the company needed to be bought out.

  2. Andrew Elphick - June 19, 2011

    I think the thread on the wonderful Autoshite message board, shows two in captivity…

    Anyway, as a footnote, if it was damp and my mum’s orange 104 failed to start, I used to get a lift to school in a pale green Arna which was recycled before I left school in 1991. That Arna had replaced a navy blue ‘Sud Series 1 so, even twenty years ago, Alfa owners were gluttons for punishment!

  3. Simon Woodward - June 19, 2011

    From ‘Sud to Arna, were Alfa Romeo MAD!!!!

  4. Martin Kershaw - June 19, 2011

    Ah, so they were never badged as the Arna over here but as the Cherry Europe? That’s a massive D’oh! on my part. I read all about the car in Stuart Bladon’s Observer’s Book of Automobiles back in 1985 (essential reading for a 10 year old). I was always puzzled as to why I never saw any of these “different” looking Alfas knocking about.

  5. Will101 - June 19, 2011

    I think that it’s a bit ironic that, prior to the Arna, the Italians saw the Triumph Acclaim as a Trojan Horse for the Japanese to set up shop in Europe but that Sir Michael Edwardes put them in their place and established that the future development of cars with the Japanese was here to stay. Italy also prevented the Acclaim from being unloaded in its dockyards some time in the Eighties even though it was better made than the Arna.

    I wonder whether the Italian Government would have caused such aggravation if BL’s badge-engineered Renault 9 had gone ahead? Who knows…

    However, as we know today, the main car manufacturers have expanded thier range line ups with a badge-engineered Japanese motors be it mini-sized up to big 4X4′s and Renault took over most of Nissan in Europe not the other way round as feared back then. Globalisation is, as stated in the article, here to stay.

  6. Will101 - June 19, 2011

    The How Many Left? website is a good one – even I was surprised by how few of some once popular models are left on the UK’s roads.

    Did the Arna’s last owner even know they were scrapping the very last one in 2007 or did he just hide it from Clarkson and company to prevent them from destroying it on TopGear or in his DVD shows?

  7. John Morris - June 19, 2011

    I’ve got bad news for you – there is still one Nissan Cherry Europe GTi taxed and on the road plus another one on a SORN!

  8. Jerry Ford - June 19, 2011

    I’ve just looked on How Many Left? to see there is one licensed Nissan Cherry Europe GTi left – I’d forgotten that there was a GTi version.

  9. Jerry Ford - June 19, 2011

    Martin Kershaw :
    Ah, so they were never badged as the Arna over here but as the Cherry Europe? That’s a massive D’oh! on my part. I read all about the car in Stuart Bladon’s Observer’s Book of Automobiles back in 1985 (essential reading for a 10 year old). I was always puzzled as to why I never saw any of these “different” looking Alfas knocking about.

    Martin, as far as I can recall both the Arna and Cherry Europe were sold over here. I worked for a Renault dealership at that time and the Used Car Manager bought two for the forecourt – I seem to remember they only had 10 miles on the clock. Anyway, needless to say, they stayed there for rather a long time rusting merrily away in the meantime!!!

  10. Hilton Davis - June 19, 2011

    I remember both the Alfa Romeo Arna and the Nissan Cherry Europe. The Japanese-built Cherrys had better build quality than the Cherry Europe, which came in 1.2 and 1.5GTi version. The GTi had alloys and looked better than the base car.

    I recall Nissan Dealers saying they had more PDI remedy work to do on them than the Japanese versions and perhaps having Nissan Dealers working on Alfa engines didn’t bode well either.

    I believe the Arna was on sale in the UK but I didn’t see many – then again, I didn’t see many Cherry Europes either! A better proposition was the Cherry 1.5 Turbo ZX (115bhp?).

  11. Chris Lane - June 19, 2011

    The How Many Left? site is brilliant! Thanks, Keith.

  12. Craig Tetlow - June 19, 2011

    The Alfa Romeo Arna and Nissan Cherry Europe were both DEFINITELY available on the British market. I’m relatively young at 34 and certainly remember seeing examples of both cars. They may have been a sales flop but they were still a fairly common site in the late 1980s to early 1990s.

  13. Keith Adams Keith Adams - June 19, 2011

    @Craig Tetlow
    Sorry if I didn’t make this clear, but I thought I’d said this in the story with the following paragraph…

    “The Arna arrived in the UK at the end of 1983 but was actually sold as the Nissan Cherry Europe and that had Nissan buyers asking the obvious question – why buy an Italian-built Japanese car, when I can have a Japanese one instead? It bombed. In 1985, Alfa Romeo started importing them, selling the Arna through its own Dealer Network and, er, it bombed – not, though, before Autocar had tested the 1.5-litre Ti version, favourably comparing it with the Alfasud Ti of old.”

    Hence, in a nutshell, the car was initially imported as a Nissan Cherry Europe and the Alfa Romeo Arna followed later.

  14. Craig Tetlow - June 19, 2011

    @Keith Adams
    Sorry, Keith you are right. I was just answering other readers’ comments. I’m looking forward to hearing of other cars which have disappeared or are about to. Yugo Sana, anyone?

  15. Ian - June 19, 2011

    Martin Kershaw :
    Ah, so they were never badged as the Arna over here but as the Cherry Europe? That’s a massive D’oh! on my part. I read all about the car in Stuart Bladon’s Observer’s Book of Automobiles back in 1985 (essential reading for a 10 year old). I was always puzzled as to why I never saw any of these “different” looking Alfas knocking about.

    A great book that – I was just looking at it on my shelf the other day!

  16. Simon Hodgetts - June 19, 2011

    Oh dear, as a lifelong Alfa Romeo fan and owner of two (soon to be three) examples – all of which I have been absolutely delighted with thanks to great looks, engines and handling – I’m so ashamed of the Arna.

    However, having read the article (which, by the way, was very good), I do now, at least, realise why Alfa Romeo needed to make the car – it couldn’t afford to develop a new small car. The thing that I can’t get to grips with – why Nissan? Could Alfa have gone to a more dull manufacturer of (okay, reliable and dependable) appliances masquerading as cars?

    Maybe a better match would have been Subaru (part-owned by Nissan at the time) – still Japanese, still built like the proverbial Swiss watch, but also interesting with generally a good chassis design and interesting styling, 4WD and even a Boxer engine. Subarus were not very common in Europe at the time (Impreza fever had yet to break), so the cars would have had a degree of exclusivity… Ah, the luxury of hindsight!

  17. Simon79 - June 19, 2011

    Good Lord – the old Arna. A true horror story if you ask me…

    Here, in Italy, it comes a (very, very) close second to the dreadful Fiat Duna (basically a booted/estate Mk1 Uno if you’ve never heard about that), in the “Worst Cars of All Time” list.

    By the way, AROnline’s such a nice site – keep up the good work!

  18. Simon Hodgetts - June 19, 2011

    @Simon79
    Ugh, I’ve just googled the Duna – it’s truly awful!

  19. Ian - June 19, 2011

    That How Many Left? site – only two FSO Polonez left!! I should get out more!!

  20. Mike - June 20, 2011

    My mam had a Nissan Cherry, B Reg and Red. I remember being wheeled around in it many, many years ago – there’s only two left? Blimey…

  21. Mr_Bol - June 20, 2011

    I’d love one of these – they’re rare even in Italy. There are three for sale at the moment on Subito.it but they’re €2500 each!!

    Am I right in thinking Alfa was state-owned when the Arna came to market?

  22. Thomas Merritt - June 20, 2011

    This was not a “real Alfa”. This scenario reminds me of a similar situation regarding a Triumph that wasn’t a “real Triumph”. Remember the Triumph Acclaim? The Acclaim was a Honda Ballade by another name and had a narrow audience of drivers who had driving gloves, barley sugars in the glovebox and Saga membership.

  23. Keith Adams Keith Adams - June 20, 2011

    @Mr_Bol
    Yes, definitely. Alfa Romeo was state-subsidised at the time. Actually, its story is so similar to BL’s and Austin-Rover’s, you’d think the Italians were looking at us for inspiration.

    That’s why Alfas feel right (to me) on this website.

    /K

  24. Adrian - June 20, 2011

    Car Heaven: Italian design with Japanese engineering.
    Car Hell: Italian engineering with Japanese design.

  25. Hilton Davis - June 20, 2011

    That’s a good comment from Adrian! I owned two Datsun Cherries (1979-81 N10 models). Both were good cars, reliable and the first ones I was able to afford new. I fancied trying the Cherry Turbo ZX but other priorities like house purchase put paid to that.

  26. Richard Kilpatrick Richard Kilpatrick - June 20, 2011

    @Adrian
    I always blamed my Peugeot 306 Cabriolet’s poor quality on having gone out and bought a French car built by Italians…

  27. Simon Woodward - June 20, 2011

    @Richard Kilpatrick
    Surely, though, that was worth it with the 306 Cabriolet? I reckon it’s a really good looking car.

  28. Steve G - June 20, 2011

    @Thomas Merritt
    Yes, but without the Triumph Acclaim (and the partnership with Honda), would Austin-Rover have made it through the 1980s?

  29. Brian Daniels - June 20, 2011

    This was a perfectly desirable car so long as you got the optional hood ornament as illustrated in the photo of the silver five door.

  30. Hilton Davis - June 20, 2011

    Yes, agreed Brian. The “hood ornament” is much more attractive than the Arna.

  31. John Morris - June 20, 2011

    I worked as a Salesman for a Nissan Dealers at the time of the ARNA partnership. We were told of this new addition to the Cherry range which was to be made in Italy and thought it would just be 100% Nissan.

    We were shocked when the first examples exited the transporter and we saw the Alfa Boxer engine under the bonnet but the importer’s attitude was just get on with it and sell them so that’s what we did.

    I can remember the seats were too big for the car so access to the rear was not easy, the interior lamp kept falling off the headlining and the appurture in the floor pressing for the gear change mechinism had not been re-tooled for the Alfa engine and gearbox so some cars had problems engaging the gears but it was nothing that a heavy thump with a hammer could not cure.

    I can also remember that most breakdowns seemed to originate from the Italian electrics – our Workshop Foreman said they reminded him of his motorcycling days! Some customers were disappointed to find and Alfa engine under the bonnet but others embraced it and bought and Alfa badge to mount along side the Nissan name plate.

    However, in the end most were heavily discounted and loaded with extras to sell them at bargain basement prices as the public became aware of their origin. The Alfa Dealers were screaming at their importers to let them have a version of the car to sell in the UK (Cherry Europes were outselling the whole Alfa range) and weren’t we glad when they did start selling them – we could then, at least, direct customers to somebody who understood the Alfa mechanicals and they imported a five door which got over the problem of getting in the back.

    The 1.5 GTi was up against Nissan’s own Cherry Turbo ZX and didn’t really get the praise it perhaps deserved as it was the most credible of the two models.

    This was not the last of Nissan’s dubious partnerships – the Edbro van was the next but that’s another tortuous story.

    Anyway, at least Nissan’s later collaborations with Ford and Renault have turned out some extremely credible cars which have customer appeal.

  32. Jerry Ford - June 20, 2011

    I’d love to hear about the Edbro van – were they as bad as they looked?

  33. Roberto Velvet - June 20, 2011

    The Arna was also a very sad story for Alfa Romeo here in Italy – at the time the JV with Nissan was conceived they were running out of money but desperately needed an entry-level car to create fresh cashflow.

    Someone on the Institute for Industrial Reconstruction’s Board (the IRI was the Italian Government-controlled holding company which owned Alfa Romeo) had this “ingenious” idea: why don’t we buy those unknown cheap cars from Japan and fit them with our engines? Japanese cars were imported into Italy in very limited numbers during the 1980s – I think hundreds – to protect the national Automotive Industry.

    I was in my teens but I remember the advertising claim: “ARNA KILOMETRISSIMA ALFA” very well – that translates as something like “Arna: the Alfa that does many MPG”.

    However, nobody wanted an Alfa Romeo which looked like a Japanese car, nobody wanted an Alfa for the low fuel consumption and, at the time, nobody wanted a small Alfa. The Alfa Romeo marque was still synonymous with sports cars (much more so than today) and the Arna rapidly became the subject of jokes.

    Oh, and strange but true, Arnas rusted faster than Alfasuds!!

    I really didn’t know how Alfa Romeo had the courage to sell the Arna abroad and also in the UK… I thought that the car was just one of our many national disgraces which were better kept secret. ;-)

  34. KeithB - June 21, 2011

    @Steve G
    You are quite right – the Acclaim was a hideous excuse for a Triumph but it did pave the way for excellent Rover 200 Mk1.

  35. Rodrigo - June 21, 2011

    Actually, at the time, Alfa Romeo was state-owned, exactly like British Leyland was. However, Alfa Romeo had been acquired by the IRI in 1932 and so had been state-owned for much longer than British Leyland.

    I always enjoy the irony that the Italian Government blamed the British Government for making the Acclaim while they were making the Arna!

    I wonder whether any Arnas were used to preserve Alfasuds or 33s…

  36. DaveH - June 22, 2011

    The Arna was ugly in comparison to the ‘Sud but it actually handled quite well for the time and it was quicker. A neighbour had a both a normal Cherry and a Cherry Europe and, going by the few lifts I had as a kid, the Cherry Europe was a pretty nifty motor.

  37. Stewart - June 23, 2011

    @KeithB
    I have had a Triumph 1300, three Dolomites and two Acclaims but, as a daily driver, the Acclaim was vastly superior to any of the earlier cars.

    Mind you, I did miss some of the ‘character’ which the earlier cars had – in the case of both Dolomite 1850s that was displayed by head gasket failure on the A34.

  38. Hilton Davis - June 23, 2011

    The Spanish/Japanese joint venture was with Ebro – not Edbro. They built vans badged as Nissan-Ebro.

    I can’t recall the power output of the Nissan Cherry Europe GTi model but think that it was about the same as the Cherry Turbo (115bhp).

    I agree about the Acclaim not being a “true” Triumph but, that model’s successor, the first Rover 200, was more appropriate.

  39. Craig Tetlow - June 23, 2011

    @Jerry Ford
    I can’t comment on how the Nissan-Ebro vans drove but I certainly remember seeing a couple of them around West Yorkshire in the late 1980s on D plates and they already looked dated and scabby with rust.

  40. Nathan - June 23, 2011

    Were the Cherry Turbo/Europe GTi powered by Nissan engines or turbocharged versions of Alfa Romeo’s Flat-4?

  41. Jonathan Carling Jonathan Carling - June 23, 2011

    @Nathan
    They were powered by different engines – the Europe GTi was the same car as the Arna and therefore had the Alfa engine. The Cherry Turbo was a traditional Nissan with a turbocharged Nissan unit.

  42. Marty B - June 23, 2011

    I remember my Primary School Teacher owning a Cherry Europe AND a normal Cherry at the same time. Most of the time he turned up in the silver five-door JapCherry – that was probably because the CherrySud was broken! I’m glad there are no more Arnas left – the poor buggers deserved to die.

  43. Hilton Davis - June 24, 2011

    The Cherry Turbo ZX had the E15 series Nissan OHC engine as also fitted to the same era Sunny 1.5 Coupe – but with an added turbocharger.

  44. Steve McGill - June 24, 2011

    Jerry Ford :
    I’d love to hear about the Edbro van – were they as bad as they looked?

    The Ebro vans (no “d” in the name) were Spanish-built ugly boxes with Nissan badges on. I remember a couple coming to the dealership where I worked in 1988 – they were nasty things but were a bit bigger than the Urvan we were selling at the time so I suppose they had some use…

  45. Will - June 26, 2011

    The only information I could find on Ebros was at this link. Was that van the Nissan Ebro? Why were they advertised as Jeep? Was it a generic term?

  46. Mike Humble Mike Humble - July 3, 2011

    The Alfa Romeo Arna gave us a whole new slant on the meaning of the word “dismal”.

  47. Glenn Aylett - July 4, 2011

    One good thing came out of this: Nissan decided never to cooperate with the Italians again – instead they opted to build their new factory in Sunderland and produce their own designs with Nissan quality control.

    Had Nissan continued their relationship with Alfa Romeo, then I often wonder if they would have had their British Leyland moment and seen their reputation ruined by bad products.

  48. Will - July 5, 2011

    @Glenn Aylett

    Nissan have had some disasters since tying up with Renault.
    The D22 Navara and the (supposedly Laguna-based) Primera P12 spring to mind. See, for instance, this article headlined The Infamous D22 Engine Problem on the Navarra Owners Club’s website.

    Mind you, that doesn’t seem to have ruined Nissan’s reputation though – the Qashcow and Joke faux-SUVs are flying out of the showrooms.

  49. Ian-M - July 19, 2011

    Breaking News!!!
    I was at National Alfa Day (the owners club annual get together) on Sunday 17th July and a recently restored, pristine Arna turned up and stole the show in the concours competition.
    So the Arna is no longer extinct.
    I am a half full, rather than half empty type of person and I feel that the Arna rather than being a dreadful car was a vast improvement on the dire boring and utterly dull nissan cherry.

  50. James C - July 19, 2011

    My godmother who was a longstanding Datsun/Nissan owner was one of those people who got talked into buying a Cherry Europe. It was actually quite nice to drive (I was 17 at the time and my only other driving experience was a Volvo 340) but it was much too sporty for her and she soon swapped it for a Micra.

  51. Richard - July 22, 2011

    Thanks Ian – M. Yes indeed, the Arna lives! I share the car with a mate (who did all the oily stuff). Granted, it never was the best looking car in the world, but it is rare – although not quite unique ;-) I know of at least two other Ti’s – one in the UK and one in Switzerland. They’re not particularly well loved in the Alfa Romeo community but, until last Sunday, many would never have seen one. Second Overall and the Best New Entrant in the National AR Concours? Made me chuckle…

  52. Tony Evans - August 15, 2011

    Nissan style combined with Alfa reliability and rustproofing. A recipe for disaster if ever there was one. I learned to drive in a driving school Datsun 120Y. It was one of the dullest cars I have ever driven albeit incredibly reliable and easy to drive. I always fancied an Alfa but was put off by the number of breakdowns and cost of fixing / servicing.

    Now a reliable Nissan designed by Alfa might have been something. IMHO, the Acclaim was a much better car overall with a peppy engine, decent handling and good reliability.

  53. Mike C - August 15, 2011

    The Acclaim was a decent, if ugly and cramped car, as Honda at that time made much better drivers’ cars than Nissan (who produced dull to drive boxes on wheels) and mechanically it was pure Japanese, with little BL input, so very reliable…

  54. Will M - August 15, 2011

    Are we about to see a new generation of Alfa Romeo Archrys based on the Dodge Nitro?

  55. bent6alfa - August 24, 2011

    ^ More likely to be Lancias…

    There are at least two other Arna off the road. The editor of Practical CLassics knows where one is hiding out.

  56. bent6alfa - August 24, 2011

  57. Ray Gill - February 8, 2013

    I had an Alfa Romeo Arna 1.5GTi. It was great and reliable. I used to start work at 8am, getting up at 7:45, out at 7:50. The damaging rorty start of the Alfa, set me up for the day. It handled well and was always willing to do its best. It was replaced with a Alfa 164 3L. That was also willing to do its best. I have had a BMW since, although as fast, it does not have the spirit of the Arna or 164.

  58. Nate - February 9, 2013

    Has anyone ever contemplated what a proper Alfa-Romeo Arna with Japanese built quality and Italian styling (though keeping the Alfa flat-4s) would have looked like?

    Would it have possessed styling elements of the 33, 75 and 90 as in typical Alfas of the 80s or would it have retained elements from the Alfasud?

Leave a Reply