austin a 35 fuel econamy
This topic has 2 voices, contains 4 replies, and was last updated by Terry Hill 4 days ago.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Home › Forums › Ask AROnline › austin a 35 fuel econamy
This topic has 2 voices, contains 4 replies, and was last updated by Terry Hill 4 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| 09/02/2012 at 10.52 pm #34721 | |
|
g scothern |
i had a a 35 van with the 34 bhp 848cc engine. if i was to get one with a later 61 bhp 1275cc engine and modifide rear axel ,what mpg wound it average ,compering to the 848cc |
| 09/02/2012 at 11.46 pm #34734 | |
|
James |
I have no idea but surely a purchase of a car of that kind doesn’t come down to MPG? Who cares… it’s a 35 and that surely enough |
| 14/05/2012 at 9.07 pm #42465 | |
|
g scoth |
it would to me ,if i could get more than 40 mpg easyly on a run the better .less gear changing |
| 15/05/2012 at 12.06 am #42467 | |
|
Dennis |
You’re still not going to be talking about stunning MPG figures, the MPi minis will only manage just over 55mpg on a run. The 998′s with economy exhausts, cam and gearing would get 70mpg. That should give you an idea of what an A35 will give you. The A35 is never going to that economical, if you want economy you’re better off buying a modern small petrol or diesel van. |
| 17/05/2012 at 8.40 pm #42707 | |
|
Terry Hill |
Haynes A30/35 Super profile claims 40-45mpg for A30, and 42-48mpg for A35. Town is 38-40/36-40 respectively |
© 2012 AROnline, in partnership with Honest John.