BMW interested in Saab?
Home › Forums › AROnline Central › BMW interested in Saab?
This topic has 5 voices, contains 21 replies, and was last updated by
Ianto 74 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| 22/02/2012 at 3.19 pm #35810 | |
|
Keith Adams |
Oh, come on… http://www.saabsunited.com/2012/02/another-press-conference-but-this-time-its-interesting.html What’s fascinating is the reactions from the posters. As an ex-Rover custodian, I’d say it wouldn’t be all beer and honey. |
| 22/02/2012 at 4.34 pm #35811 | |
|
Frankie the 75 nut |
Well, look at BINI. Say what you like about them, but there’s no denying BMW knew what they were doing. |
| 22/02/2012 at 5.43 pm #35844 | |
|
Ianto |
Why would BMW want to do this, obviously I want SAAB to be saved but cannot see how this could possibly make sense for BMW. |
| 22/02/2012 at 7.00 pm #35884 | |
|
H.Jones |
There would be no possibility of BMW donating some of the extra unnecessaries of it’s range to Saab, is there? |
| 22/02/2012 at 7.39 pm #35892 | |
|
Mark Mastro |
BMW’s venture capitalist-ness coming out again here, it’s been a while! |
| 23/02/2012 at 5.13 pm #35929 | |
|
Ianto |
I think SAABs united are getting carried away, there doesn’t seem to be any substance to this story. |
| 24/02/2012 at 6.39 pm #36011 | |
|
Richard Kilpatrick |
Well, if there were, it’d be that BMW wants to offer a FWD range, and could use SAAB to do so without diluting the BMW brand. I think it’s an idea with legs, no matter how unlikely. It’s laughable that the BINI is so big, but you cannot deny BMW have thoroughly understood, utilised and developed the Mini brand equity, in a way that GM simply failed to do with SAAB. And whilst their management of Rover was poor, they did understand enough for the 75 to happen – possibly the most Rovery Rover since the P6. |
| 27/02/2012 at 7.01 pm #36092 | |
|
David 3500 |
I really can’t see why BMW would want to buy Saab. After all, the current Saab range is either too old and in need of replacement (9-3) or has so much red tape involving the supply of parts or limitations in what can be made to other partners (9-5) because of previous owner General Motors. Saab needs a new range of products free of such red tape sooner rather than later, and I really can’t see BMW wanting to get tied up in all that. Especially not with General Motors. If BMW wanted a supplementary sporting brand then it would probably be more cost effective and less fraught for them to relaunch the Triumph brand, complete with new saloon models derived from modified versions of BMW’s platforms. Other than Volkswagen Audi Group as a very slight prospect (I do doubt this), I can’t see another wealthy European car maker keen to take over what was an ailing brand with a very limited product range. That said, I hope there is an opportunity for Saab to live on for another day and under the right owners. |
| 27/02/2012 at 9.14 pm #36110 | |
|
Ianto |
I can’t see it either, as much as I want SAAB to survive. What could BMW do, create a retro styled new 99/900 or 96 to plug the narrow gap between the MINI and the 1 series. If any firm could do it it would be BMW, but do they really need to in this financial climate. |
| 27/02/2012 at 10.36 pm #36133 | |
|
Mark Mastro |
No, just use the respected brand as a FWD alternative to it’s own badged products giving 2 bites at the middle manager |

