Although the Rover 213/216 range was a straightforward replacement for the Triumph Acclaim, it was big news in marketing terms - the Rover marque would be taken into uncharted territories and that was something of a risk.
The lightly remodelled Honda Ballade with the option of the British S-Series engine in 1.6-litre form was the vehicle for this downward expansion - and the result was a plushly appointed small saloon. But was it up to the challenge posed by its European and Japanese rivals?
Small, perfectly formed?
Audi 80 B2: 1978-1986 |
![]() |
BMW 3-Series (316i): 1984-1991 |
![]() |
Fiat Regata: 1984-1990 |
![]() |
Ford Orion: 1983-1990 |
![]() |
Lancia Prisma: 1983-1990 |
![]() |
Peugeot 305: 1977-1988 |
![]() |
Renault 9: 1981-1988 |
![]() |
Vauxhall Belmont: 1984-1991 General Motors' Orion competitor was another one of those cars that was more impressive on paper than it was on the road. Six-light styling and new front bumper differentiated it from the Astra it was based on, but not enough to convince buyers to take it to their hearts. Overtly aerodynamic styling was brave in the light of the reception given the Ford Sierra, but it opened a new era of slippery styling for General Motors. |
![]() |
Volkswagen Jetta Mk2: 1984-1991 Arguably, Vokswagen created the hatch-from-saloon market with the original Jetta in 1979, so the well resolved styling of its 1984 replacement shouldn't come as a surprise. Just like the Golf, it came in a myriad of engine and trim options, including the impressive 139bhp 1.8-litre 16V engine. Well-built and reliable, the Jetta sold reasonably well in mainland Europe, but didn't take off the in UK - we love Golfs. |
![]() |
Volvo 360: 1982-1991 Volvo's 300-Series proved one of the UK's unlikeliest sales hits of the Eighties, as buyers found themselves magnetically attracted to the rugged small Volvo's combination of perceived safety and low prices. Rear wheel drive live-axled chassis was hardly cutting edge, but 1.7- and 2-litre Renault engines delivered adequate performance - and for most buyers, that was enough. 360 saloon a minor seller in the range. |
![]() |
Verdict
FEW within Austin-Rover would have predicted the sales success of the Rover 213/216 - especially considering how unpopular small saloons tended to be with UK buyers in the Eighties, but after a faltering start it went on to become a staple product in the range, partially responsible for the death of the Austin marque name.
Looking at the Rover's rivals it's easy to understand why these cars failed to sell in big numbers - blandness was the order of the day.
The cars that stand out in this pack - the BMW 3-Series and Peugeot 305 were both purpose-built as saloons and had no hatchbacked brethren to sully their bloodline. Cars such as the Orion, Belmont and Renault 9 have all but disappeared off the roads today, and it would seem the Rover 213 and 216 are suffering the same fate, even though there was no equivalent Austin-Rover hatchback to steal sales from.
So, which of this group would you buy today, given the choice? For us, the Rover does extremely well here, because there's so much attention to detail gone into the choice of interior fabrics and equipment that you really do feel that it's a cut above the more mundane Fords and Vauxhalls of the world. It was a perceived advantge, truth be told, but was enough to convince many a buyer that they were buying into something special.
It's hard not to be tempted by the Lancia Prisma, thanks to its lively twin-cam engines and plush interior, the Peugeot 305, because of its masterful chassis and understated styling, and - yes - the BMW 3-Series, as a good one still has a quality feel today.
But given the niceties you get in a Rover 216 Vanden Plas EFi - leather and wood - it's a very compelling package. Especially today's prices. Yes, it has a choppy ride and a gruff engine - and is cramped inside, but we still like these cars.
Good luck finding one...

With help from Mark Mastrototaro