AROnline
  • Home
    • Go to random page
  • Cars
    • Austin/Morris
      • Morris Minor
      • Austin A30/A35/A40
      • Austin FX4/FL2 Black cab
      • BMC 1100/1300
      • BMC 1800/2200
      • Austin 3 Litre
      • Austin Maxi
      • Austin Kimberley/Tasman (X6)
      • Austin Apache
      • Morris Marina
      • Leyland Sherpa
      • Leyland P76/P82
      • Austin Allegro
      • Austin-Morris Princess
      • Morris Ital
      • Austin Metro
      • Austin Ambassador
      • Austin Maestro
      • Austin Montego
    • Rover
      • Rover P5
      • Rover P6
      • Rover SD1
      • Rover 200 (SD3)
      • Rover 800 (XX/R17)
      • Rover 200/400 (R8)
      • Rover Metro/100 (R6)
      • Rover 600 (SK1)
      • Rover 200/25 (R3)
      • Rover 400/45 (HHR)
      • Rover 75 (R40)
      • Rover Streetwise
      • CityRover (RD10)
    • Jaguar
      • Mk2/S-type/420
      • MkX/420G
      • E-type
      • XJ6/XJ12 (XJ4)
      • XJ-S
      • XJ (XJ40)
      • XJ (X300/X308)
      • S-TYPE (X200)
      • X-TYPE (X400)
      • XJ (X350)
      • XK (X150)
      • XF (X250)
      • XJ (X351)
      • XF (X260)
      • F-Type (X152)
      • XE (X760)
      • F-Pace (X761)
      • i-Pace
    • Land Rover
      • Defender
      • Range Rover (Classic)
      • Discovery
      • Range Rover (P38A)
      • Freelander
      • Range Rover (L322)
      • Evoque
      • Range Rover (L405)
      • Range Rover Sport
      • Discovery Sport (L550)
      • Discovery 5
      • Range Rover Velar (L560)
    • MG
      • Midget
      • MGB/MGC
      • Austin/MG Metro (LC8)
      • Austin/MG Maestro (LC10)
      • MGF/TF
      • ZR
      • ZS
      • ZT
      • XPower SV
      • MG6
      • MG3
      • MG GS
    • Mini
      • Mini (ADO15)
      • Mini Cooper
      • Mini Clubman
      • MINI (R50/R56)
      • MINI (F56)
      • Countryman/Paceman
    • Triumph
      • Triumph Herald/Vitesse
      • Triumph Spitfire
      • 2000/2500
      • Triumph 1300/Toledo/Dolomite
      • TR6
      • Triumph Stag
      • Triumph TR7/TR8
      • Triumph Acclaim
    • Ford
      • Consul/Zephyr/Zodiac
      • Cortina
      • Escort
      • Capri
      • Ford Granada (1972-1985)
      • Fiesta
      • Sierra
      • Mondeo
    • Vauxhall
      • Viva
      • Victor
      • Chevette
      • Cavalier
      • Astra
    • Rootes/Chrysler/Talbot
      • Hillman Imp
      • Hillman Hunter
      • Hillman Avenger
      • Simca 1000
      • Simca 1100
      • Chrysler 160/180/2-Litre (C Car)
      • Chrysler Alpine/Talbot Solara
      • Chrysler Sunbeam
      • Chrysler Horizon
      • Matra Bagheera/Murena
      • Talbot Tagora
      • Talbot Samba
    • TVR
      • M-Series
      • TVR Tasmin
      • Griffith
    • ‘Other cars’
      • AC 3000ME
      • Alfa Romeo Alfasud
      • Argyll Turbo GT
      • Bond Equipe
      • DeLorean DMC-12
      • Enfield 8000 Electric
      • Lotus Esprit M70/X180
      • Matra-Simca Rancho
      • Midas
      • Nissan Qashqai
      • Reliant Scimitar
      • Sinclair C5
      • Trident Clipper
  • Reviews & Drives
    • Car Reviews
    • Drive Stories
    • Our Cars
      • Mike’s Rover 400
      • Mike’s Rover 416GSi
      • Mike’s Montego
      • Mike’s Rover 75
      • Mike’s Rover 214SLi
      • Mike’s 214GSi
      • Alexander’s Citroën XM
      • Alexander’s Rover 800
      • Keith’s Range Rover P38
      • Keith’s Freelander
      • Keith’s Rover 75
      • Keith’s Citroen Xantia Activa
      • Keith’s Citroen C6
      • Keith’s Polish Rover SD1
      • Keith’s Rover SD1 Vitesse
      • Keith’s Renault Avantime
    • Staples2Naples 2004
    • Staples2Naples 2005
    • Czech Wrecks 2008
    • RatRod 2011
  • News
    • All News
      • Jaguar Land Rover
      • MG Motor UK
      • MINI
    • All Events
    • MGR@10 Month
    • Rover SD1@ 40 Special
    • Geneva Motor Show
    • Archive
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
    • Your Cars
    • Best of AROnline
    • Videos
  • Facts & Figures
    • Mechanical marvels
      • Commercials
      • Buses
      • The bus section
      • Rail Projects
    • History Files
      • British Leyland – The Grand Illusion
      • British Motor Holdings – the joining of BMC and Jaguar
      • Evolution of the AR logo
      • The Road to Perdition
      • The Whole Story
      • Road vs Rail
      • Urban myths and old wives’ tales
      • Interviews and personalities
      • Production figures
      • Development codes
      • Project Drive
    • The converters
      • Avon Coachworks
      • Chris Humberstone
      • Crayford
      • Lynx Engineering
      • Mumford
      • Panther
      • Paul Banham Conversions
      • Rapport International
      • Startins/MacNeille
      • Tickford
      • William Towns
      • Wood & Pickett
      • Woodall Nicholson
    • Concepts & Prototypes
      • BMC, BL and ARG Concepts
      • Ford concepts
      • Jaguar concepts
      • Land Rover concepts
      • MG concepts
      • MINI concepts
      • Rover concepts
      • Sports car concepts
      • Supermini concepts
      • Vauxhall concepts
    • AROnline Overseas
      • Around the World
      • Also known as
      • Carrozzeria designs
      • Connections
    • People
      • Alec Issigonis
      • Spen King
      • George Turnbull
    • Galleries
      • In production
      • Museums
    • Resources
      • Buying Guides
      • BMC, Leyland and Rover engines
      • Press photos
    • The Ryder Report
  • Marques
    • Austin
    • Authi
    • Hillman
    • Hindustan Motors
    • Innocenti
    • Jaguar
    • Land Rover
    • MG
    • Morris
    • Riley
    • Rover
    • Standard
    • Standard Motor Products
    • Sterling
    • Triumph
    • Vanden Plas
    • Wolseley
  • Timeline

Princess (ADO71)

The Leyland Princess development story tells a rather confused tale. It never actually started out as such – but as a marque-confused Austin, Morris and Wolseley mid-liner to replace the slow-selling Landcrab.

However, BL’s wedge-shaped odyssey didn’t sell that well, either, although that was more down to the poor reputation of the company  which built it – and early build niggles – than any weakness in the product itself. Born at a different time to a more highly-respected maker, it could have ruled the roost.


Leyland Princess development story: wedged in the future

The cars : Princess/Ambassador development history

The  Austin 1800  and its sister models  (collectively known by the  ADO17 codename) did not have a particularly distinguished career as BMC’s flagship front-wheel-drive range. Sales were disappointing because the car – which possessed a great deal of potential – simply did not appeal to the target buyers.

Even though the car was an unreserved sales flop, BMC did little work on replacing the car, which meant that it would be down to Leyland to formulate plans – and, because it was younger than the ADO16, it would have to take second place to that model. Once Donald Stokes had finalised the company’s plans in the lower-mid range, attention was finally turned to the ADO17 and how best to replace it.

First thoughts

Initial thoughts on the matter were put down on paper by Filmer Paradise on 27 February 1970 (some six years after the launch of the ADO17) which was contained in a confidential memorandum, submitted to the members of the Product Policy Committee.

Echoing the thoughts of John Barber, Paradise made it clear that the main growth in the car market would be in the upper-medium sector  (referred to as the D-segment) and, as the ADO17 needed replacing, it made sense to pitch its replacement further upmarket. This plan was, in the opinion of Paradise, one that Austin-Morris urgently needed to put in place and the design should be Euro-friendly to meet the challenges of the late-1970s effectively.

Marketing thought the car should be rear-wheel drive, but the decision to continue with front-wheel drive was swiftly made by the Product Policy Committee, which felt the ADO17 chassis and engine/transmission pack would form the ideal base for the new car. Besides, changing to rear-wheel drive would send out the wrong messages to buyers after the company had done so much to pioneer front-wheel drive.

Leyland christens its new car the Diablo

One of the first
Two of the first Diablo concept pictures, as penned by Harris Mann. The Princess character is already abundantly clear
Two-door scheme never made it into production... (Picture: BMIHT)

By August 1970, the first full-size clay model is finished - and it shows remarkable similarities to Mann's early sketch (above). Contrast this with the final clay model of November 1970, shown below.
By August 1970, the first full-size clay model is finished – and it shows remarkable similarities to Mann’s early sketches (above). Contrast this with the final clay model of November 1970, shown below

Leyland princess development: slippery wedge…

Not a glamourous picture this, but it shows the ADO71 undergoing wind-tunnel testing at MIRA (Motor Industry Research Association) in Nuneaton. This is actually a one-third scale model and demonstrates that the air flow over this model was pretty good for its day. Drag co-efficient was Cd0.404 (compared with 0.44 for a Ford Cortina Mark IV).
Not a glamorous picture this, but it shows the ADO71 undergoing wind-tunnel testing at MIRA (Motor Industry Research Association) in Nuneaton. This is actually a one-third scale model and demonstrates that the air flow over this model was pretty good for its day. Drag co-efficient was Cd0.404 (compared with 0.44 for a Ford Cortina Mk4)

Three-box alternative

What do you get when you cross a coke-bottle design with a wedge? This proposal for a three-box saloon was ruled out early in the car's development, with Saab and Rover P8 overtones. (Picture: John Capon)
What do you get when you cross a coke-bottle design with a wedge? This proposal for a three-box saloon was ruled out early in the car’s development, with Saab and Rover P8 overtones. (Picture: John Capon)

Frontal treatments

Despite the fact that the new Leyland management charged their BMC forebears with excessively resorting to badge-engineering, they planned for their upcoming
Despite the fact that the new Leyland management charged their BMC forebears with excessively resorting to badge-engineering, they planned for their upcoming D-segment car to be available in Austin, Morris and Wolseley forms. (Pictures: John Capon)

Many frontal treatments were tried... (Picture: BMIHT)
Many frontal treatments were tried… (Picture: BMIHT)
What's this Project Delta? (Picture: BMIHT)

Trapezoidal headlamps coming through... (Picture: BMIHT)
Trapezoidal headlamps coming through… (Picture: BMIHT)
If only... (Picture: BMIHT)

Interior designs

At this time, the car was given the project name Diablo, encompassing a number of Harris Mann designs already on the table. Once the mechanical package was settled, the new car became a much more serious study. Originally, the 1750cc E-Series engine was mooted as the entry-level power pack, as it had the advantage of a five-speed gearbox over the B-Series-powered ADO17.

The upper models would use the E6 engine, already used in the Austin/Morris/Wolseley 2200, but with the addition of a five-speed gearbox. The body of the car was allowed to grow, to compete with the Ford Cortina Mk3, Opel Rekord or Peugeot 504.

This enlargement would facilitate an improved driving position, allow a larger boot and improve the car’s crash-worthiness. More importantly, it would have class-leading passenger space.

Styling the British wedge

Original Harris Mann sketch shows just exactly where the lineage of the ADO71 originated. This drawing, produced for Project Condor in 1969, shows just how much Harris Mann believed in the wedge shape. The squared off wheel arches and air extractor at the base of the C-post also show hints of Allegro, which he had worked on the previous year.
Original Harris Mann sketch shows just exactly where the lineage of the ADO71 originated. This drawing, produced for Project Condor in 1969, shows just how much Harris Mann believed in the wedge shape. The squared off wheel arches and air extractor at the base of the C-post also show hints of Allegro, which he had worked on the previous year

BL Board approval was given and development of the car continued apace. The man chosen to create a look for the ADO71 was Harris Mann. He had previously worked on the Morris Marina and created the Austin Allegro – and, since the BLMC Design Studio had been moved from Cowley to Longbridge in 1970,  he  had replaced Roy Haynes in overall charge of car design.

From futuristic sports cars to great family saloons

In 1969, after Mann had been asked to create a design for a futuristic sports car (which ended up as the BL Zanda, a good-looking design exercise for a sports coupe that had been presented to the press at the Earls Court Motor Show), he was asked to produce a saloon in the same vein. Unlike the Zanda, which became a full-size show prototype, the saloon car was nothing more than a paper study. However, the drawings were issued as part of a press release.

This saloon concept caught the attention of upper management and Mann was asked to develop the concept further. The idea was that the futuristic proposal completely captured the spirit of the upmarket aspirations that the company had for the ADO71 and so the styling work that Harris Mann had been working on was now transferred to this project.

First clay model, completed in November 1970 at Longbridge shows that unlike the Allegro, the lines of the Princess made it from concept to production reality without too much corruption from the production engineers. Harris Mann is stood to the far left in this picture.
First clay model, completed in November 1970 at Longbridge shows that, unlike the Allegro, the lines of the Princess made it from concept to production reality without too much corruption from the Production Engineers. Harris Mann is stood to the far left in this picture

Harris Mann worked on productionising his concept and, within weeks, the Design Department had produced a full-sized version of the car. Even at this early stage in its design process, it was translating into an interesting and good-looking design. Notable Harris Mann trademarks were the pronounced ‘wedge’ shape incorporating a low front, high rear and fastback tail.

Thoughtful design points were the concealed windscreen wipers, as well as a raised section towards the rear of the roofline, which reduced aerodynamic lift at speed. The initial styling study for Diablo actually incorporated a hatchback, and this would have enabled the ADO71 to compete more effectively with upcoming rivals, such as the Audi 100 Avant and Renault 20.

By December 1970, the BL Board had viewed the clay model and digested the technical specification and marketing plans and, without too much procrastination, decided to give the ADO71 the go-ahead for full-scale production.

Board approval: Diablo becomes ADO71

Initial viewings of the ADO71 were conducted at Longbridge alongside its predecessor. This picture demonstrates just how much the contrast between old and new really was. One aspect of Harris Mann's wedge design was that it afforded excellent interior room whilst maintaining relatively short overhangs - something that continued BMC traditions of old.
Initial viewings of the ADO71 were conducted at Longbridge alongside its predecessor. This picture demonstrates just how much the contrast between old and new really was. One aspect of Harris Mann’s wedge design was that it afforded excellent interior room while maintaining relatively short overhangs – something that continued BMC traditions of old

Some fairly wide-ranging decisions needed to be made with regards to the production of the car at this point. The first was dropping the E-Series engine from the engine line-up. Easily taken, this decision came about because sales projections (in hindsight, ambitious) indicated the Allegro and Maxi would use all of Cofton Hackett’s production capacity. In its place, the safe option was taken and the ADO17’s B-Series unit would take its place.

The single carburettor version of the E-Series engine was also considerably less powerful than the B-Series and, because the ADO71 was nearly as heavy as ADO17, the newer engine was judged less-than ideal anyway.

Long-term planning also meant this decision was expedient in the face of the upcoming O-Series engine (at the time, still seen as a straightforward OHC conversion of the B-Series). Using the older engine meant that the conversion to the O-Series would be a relatively straightforward affair.

Two stages of ADO71 development. Left: The final clay model is analysed by a DEA computer for in order to produce an exact set of dimensions - this process will produce the digrams that will then go to Pressed Steel Fisher so that it could produce the body panels for the new car. Right: This development model is used for producing a final interior. If you look closely, you can just see a proposal for ADO73, a frontally facelifted Marina that never appeared. (Pictures supplied by Kevin Davis)
Two stages of ADO71 development. Left: The final clay model is analysed by a DEA computer in order to produce an exact set of dimensions – this process produced the digrams that then  went to Pressed Steel Fisher so that it could produce the body panels for the new car. Right: This development model was used for producing a final interior. If you look closely, you can just see a proposal for ADO73, a frontally facelifted Marina that never appeared. (Pictures supplied by Kevin Davis)

So why no hatchback for the Princess?

The questionable decision to offer the ADO71 as a saloon and not a hatchback was taken at this time. As we shall see, there was a simple reason for this, but BLMC’s marketeers touted a string of alternative explanations, none of which got anywhere near the truth.

A statement released at the time of the 18-22 Series launch said: ‘Product planners felt that, in the class that the car was aimed at, a hatchback was seen as being somewhat out of place (despite what Rover was doing at Solihull with the SD1 at the same time). The hatchback concept was being seen exclusively as the province of the small car, whereas the ADO71 was conceived to replace not only ADO17, but the Austin 3 Litre as well. Besides, BLMC was already well-served in the middle market with its  hatchback Maxi; it  did not want the new car to take sales away from it.’

It added: ‘The Engineering Department was also encouraged to shy away from creating the car as five-door model because it would have added extra weight and complexity, with only marginal improvements in accommodation. Market research for BLMC also indicated that a saloon was what customers wanted.’ However, the reality showed that, by not producing a hatchback, the company may have done itself out of sales, especially in Europe – the subsequent popularity of the format showed how wrong Austin-Morris was (certainly the sales success of the SD1 was not impaired because it was a hatchback).

A little bit of politics…

Leyland Princess development story: It might not wanted to have build a hatchback Princess, but that didn't stop Crayford conversions building the Torcars five-door 'estate' version
Leyland might not wanted to have build a hatchback Princess, but that didn’t stop Crayford conversions building the Torcars five-door ‘estate’ version

The truth was (as always) more disturbing. The Princess never received a hatchback because, as one senior insider at the time put it, ‘…I believe there was some politics about not conflicting with SD1. [A bit odd really, given that we’d had the Maxi since 1969, and ‘executive hatchbacks’ were still a bit daring.]

‘There was a definite tendency to push Austin-Morris feature levels down from whatever Rover were proposing, instead of letting each model range achieve its best level on straight economics.’

This story would also be echoed during the development of the Rover SD1 in relation to Jaguar.

‘lastic upgraded to ‘gas – a suspended story

Charles Griffin was placed in charge of developing the chassis of the ADO71 and the question of what system was to be used was an easy one to answer. Hydragas, as first seen in the Allegro was the obvious choice, differing only in detail from it in the set-up of its front suspension, which actually mirrored the Maxi.

To ensure a pliant ride, the spring rates in this application were exceptionally soft. To back this up, the unusual step was taken to design the ADO71 to use wide, low profile tyres on narrow wheel rims; relying on lower than usual tyre pressures and the resulting flexing of the tyres’ sidewalls to add further ride softness.

It has to be said that, if the intention was to achieve Citroën-like ride, the Chassis Engineers reached their aims very easily; the finished car had a ride quality that was almost in the same league as the  Citroën CX – certainly, it had none of the bounciness that afflicted the Allegro.


Video: Leyland 18-22 Series development

Part one:

Part two:


Slicing through the air

Development work continued and some wind tunnel tuning of the shape was all that was felt to be needed, which must have been a relief to Harris Mann, who had seen his previous design, the Allegro corrupted on its way to production. The final shape that emerged was only slightly different from the original clay model of November, 1971.

Its comparatively clean aerodynamic shape (co-efficient of drag was cd0.404) was testament to the initial ‘rightness’ of Mann’s design. Accommodation was also marked out as a strong point; seat room was as good as the ADO17 up front, only slightly worse at the rear and, most importantly, the driving position was far more reclined than the sit-up-and-beg ADO17.

In development, it is fair to say that all the aims set out for the car in 1970 were met – and a great deal of credit for this should be laid at the feet of Charles Griffin, who ensured that the ADO71 project did not lose sight of its objectives.

The 18-22 series launch story

Austin 1800 in launch spec. Trapezoidal headlights were an eye-catching innovation for British Leyland
Austin 1800 in launch spec. Trapezoidal headlights were an eye-catching innovation for British Leyland

The press launch for the ADO71 was held on 13 February 1975 where Keith Hopkins, Managing Director of the Austin-Morris division, spelt out British Leyland’s new upmarket policy for selling the division’s cars. ‘This upmarket policy may have been misconstrued by some people.

‘What we are doing is a recognition of the fact that with an Austin-Morris output of below one million cars a year it is just not sensible or realistic for us to try to compete head on with those of our international competitors who have output potentials twice or three times as big as ours,’ he said.

Mr Hopkins added that the Austin-Morris division’s policy was to improve product quality and refine engineering standards to a degree which justified the slightly higher price for each model: ‘We shall be seeking to create little niches in the world market place which are more profitable for us.’ However, he emphasised that Austin-Morris was not opting out of the volume section of the market and indeed intended to consolidate its position as leader of this sector.

‘We set out to build a new truly international car, not a scaled down American car.’ – Harris Mann

When the ADO71 was unveiled to the public on 26 March 1975, just weeks before the publication of the Ryder Report, it did so to an embattled audience. Where there was a real sense of disappointment at the ugliness of the Allegro, the 18-22 Series, as it was named, emerged as a good-looking and interesting car. The dealers must have shared the same sense of relief, because whereas the Allegro sales never got close to matching the sales ADO16, there was a real feeling that the new car would comfortably outsell the ADO17.

Certainly, British Leyland’s own forecasts reflected this view and the production facility at Cowley North works was greatly modernised with an increased production volume in mind. After the launch, Harris Mann discussed the new cars style with David Benson of the Daily Express: ‘We set out to build a new truly international car, not a scaled down American car, but a car that would have a distinctive flavour and would sell well in this country and Europe.

‘The wedge shape was inspired by Grand Prix cars, but it is also very practical as it has been proved on the race track. It gives better penetration through the air and. in our case, better fuel consumption. I also wanted the car to look firm and eager even when parked at the kerb. It is built with its wheels out to the full width of the body, sitting firmly on the ground rather than pouring over the wheels as American cars do.’

Strikes and strife take hold

Unfortunately for BLMC, Cowley was arguably its most militant plant. In January and February 1975 production at the plant had been disrupted by a four-week strike of 250 engine tuners and rectifiers which restricted Cowley to 80 per cent of its normal output. In fact, it was during this dispute that the public got its first glimpse of British Leyland’s forthcoming car.

In its 10 January 1975 issue, the Daily Express newspaper printed a photograph of an ADO71 car leaving the strike afflicted Cowley plant, a full two and a half months before its official launch. On launch day itself,  The Times newspaper published a photograph of Lord Stokes with the top of the range Wolseley, for he was still boss of British Leyland as the new car appeared in the hiatus between the first injection of Government money and the publication of the Ryder Report.

Some 8000 Austin, Morris and Wolseley versions were in the hands of the dealers for launch day. With the help of a night shift, production at the Cowley factory was running at about 1000 a week, and the plan was to build up to 1400 by mid-year.

Leyland Princess: mechanically unsurprising

Advert from March 1975 shows that seven years after the Leyland takeover, badge-engineering was still rife.

Mechanically, the ADO71 offered no great surprises, with its choice of B and E6-Series engines, four-speed gearboxes and Hydragas suspension – the O-Series would have to wait for the first facelift. The press lauded the car for its impressive stability at speed, superior ride quality and well-sorted front-wheel drive handling.

Importantly, BL learned lessons from the ADO17 and fitted power-assisted steering to the car, offering it as standard on the 2200 version and an optional extra on the 1800 – the fact was that the system made a huge difference to the driving experience and the heavy, low-geared manual set-up which had dominated all driving impressions of the ADO17.

Interior accommodation was predictably praised and dashboard ergonomics – never a strong point of the ADO17 – were described as, ‘futuristic’ by one publication. The question of the styling was unanswered, but few disagreed with the sentiment at the time, that it was considerably more appealing than the Allegro, Maxi and the ADO17.

When the morale at British Leyland, be it in the factories or the dealers, was at its lowest ebb, it was seen as genuinely good news that the company had something appealing to sell.

Testing times: what the papers said

After its test of the 2200HL on 29 March 1975, Autocar  summed up the car favourably: ‘All in all, this is a most satisfactory car, which should do much for Austin-Morris. We wish it well, and are confident that it will find wide favour with both the business man seeking a refined, comfortable mile eater and the family man who needs proper space for a growing brood.’

The new Austin-Morris 18-22 range together at launch: at the rear, the Austin, foreground right, the Morris and foreground left, the range-topping Wolseley. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis.
The new Austin-Morris 18-22 range together at launch: at the rear, the Austin, foreground right, the Morris and foreground left, the range-topping Wolseley. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis)

Interior of the top-of-the-range Wolseley model shows extensive use of plush carpeting and wood veneer. Also evident from this shot is just how much the new car had dropped the bus driver driving position of the old 1800/2200 model.
Interior of the top-of-the-range Wolseley model shows extensive use of plush carpeting and wood veneer. Also evident from this shot is just how much the new car had dropped the bus driver driving position of the old 1800/2200 model

What was left unsaid in the test was that the 110bhp 2200HL version was blessed with rather less than sparkling performance; much was made of the excellent stability, superb ride and strong brakes, but the straight line speed – or rather lack of it – was carefully glossed over. The figures told a rather stark story, though: 0-60mph in 13.5 seconds, a maximum speed of 104mph, 50-70 in fourth gear took a yawning 13.2 seconds and an overall fuel consumption figure of 20.7mpg. Most price rivals were significantly quicker and, to the customers that the car was aimed at, this was important.

Marketing the car did pose some issues for the company’s management, but the only problem was one of potential confusion in the minds of the car’s customers. It would seem odd that, after the proclamation given by Donald Stokes that the company would no longer enter into the practice of badge engineering, that the new car would appear in Austin, Morris and Wolseley guises.

Leyland Princess: off to a flying start

By the end of the first week the new car had been on sale, British Leyland distributors and dealers were reporting so much interest in the company’s new model that they were predicting that it would become the best-selling large saloon ever produced by a British company. A spokesman for Mann Egerton, one of the largest BLMC distributors in the country, said: ‘We are being offered Peugeots,  Citroëns and BMWs in part exchange for the new car.

These are normally regarded as being up market of the Austin-Morris range. We can sell every 1800/2200 we can get, but naturally we are being a little careful about the type of car we are taking in part exchange. We now have a car which, because of its advanced styling and comprehensive equipment, is more than a match for the importers. And at £2100 it is very competitively priced.’

A British Leyland spokesman added: ‘We don’t want to crow too early, but motorists’ initial response has been so good that we are all getting a little excited about the car’s prospects.’

…then it grinds to a halt

However, any illusion that the Cowley workforce would pull together and make the ADO71 a success were shattered on 18 April 1975, when 2700 workers walked out on strike. The latest trouble at Cowley stemmed from a management decision to curtail production of the Marina range by introducing a four-day working week in some areas of the plant.

This was the first day that the Marina lines were closed, with 1600 production workers laid off. The dispute arose when the management decided that another 150 indirect workers, who serviced the production lines, would also have to be sent home because there was no work for them. The Transport and General Workers’ Union (TGWU) Shop Stewards then called-out the plant’s 2700 indirect workers, telling the management they intended to operate a policy of ‘one out, all out’. As a result, a further 3300 Cowley workers had to be laid off and all production, including the 18-22, was halted. Work resumed four days later.

Then, in early May, a strike at Dunlop, and a repeat of the 19 April strike restricted output – and, by the middle of the month, all production had halted again. After the Dunlop dispute was resolved, the 18-22 resumed production, but then, on 4 July 1975, a strike at a British Leyland components factory in Hemel Hempstead brought production to a grinding halt once again. It was to be well over a month before production could be resumed.

Wolseley dies, then a Princess is born

However, the marketing plan dictated that it was necessary to launch the 18-22 Series, badged three different ways because of the fact that, after seven years in existence, British Leyland still operated independent Austin and Morris franchises. At the time of the launch of the 18-22 Series, the ADO77 Marina replacement was still only in the early stages of development, but back in 1971 when the decision was made to offer the ADO71 in three varieties, the Marina had just been launched and the Product Planners knew that there would be no new Morris cars for a very long time.

No apologetic advertising by the company following the launch of the Princess marque in September 1975: The company's management were still very proud of their newest product, even following the hasty name change. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis)
No apologetic advertising by the company following the launch of the Princess marque in September 1975: The company’s management were still very proud of their newest product, even following the hasty name change. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis)

The answer was to unify the Austin and Morris dealerships – a process that had slowly taking shape anyway since the formation of BLMC in 1968. The matter was finally brought to a close in September 1975, when the Austin-Morris 18-22 Series would henceforth be known as the Princess. The re-branding exercise sadly closed the book on Wolseley, with the last of the long, great line  being  produced on 11 September 1975.

In response to the recommendations of the Ryder Report and its wish there should be a single unified car company, the Princess name – a marque in its own right, apparently – was applied to the ADO71 range and used in much the same way as the Mini name had been since 1969. Now that the Austin-Morris Princess (or Leyland Princess, as it was known as by just about everyone) was firmly established on the market, it did not take long for the cracks to show.

Cowley stoppages mar the changover

The first disruption to Princess production occurred in October. All production of Marina, Maxi and Princess (18-22 Series) cars at the Cowley plant was halted, and 2500 assembly workers laid off by a 24-hour strike of 66 car testers, who wanted to be regraded. Then, in November, the installation of a safety barrier provoked a stoppage on the Princess line at Cowley. One man refused to work because he said it prevented him reaching car parts he had to fit – and that led to 300 night shift workers being sent home.

A spokesman for Leyland Cars said the barrier was installed at the request of the factory’s Safety Committee. In early December, it was the turn of strikers at Oxford Radiators to bring the Princess line to a halt. Early 1976 was calm, and production  was  relatively uninterupted, until a strike at the SU Carburettor factory brought production to a halt in April.

It would be easy to list the industrial disputes ad infinitum, and to continue would be repetitive – but the above only serves to illustrate how British Leyland managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The 18-22/Princess may have been the most desirable new car of 1975, but could you get one when you wanted it?

Leyland Princess: earning a poor reputation

Unreliability was a problem that had seemingly befell all British Leyland products since the Mini, but by 1975 the problem was so bad and so public – when the Princess started to develop faults, they became national news. Nightmare stories of collapsing suspension and driveshaft failures did not help BL at all and because the Engineers seemed to take such a long time to cure the problems, the  company’s reputation plummeted further.

Because British Leyland was now controlled by the Government and funded by tax-payers, special attention was paid  to all the negative  aspects  of the company. As the Princess was its newest product, it attracted the most attention. The problem was simple: BLMC rushed the introduction of the Princess.

One Cowley fitter put it in succinct terms: ‘The question of quality on the Princess was, in the beginning, really bad. The main problem was bad fit up of parts, and poor colour matching of internal trim. This improved fairly quickly once the launch of the car was done.’

Brigadier Charles Maple: in for quality

The company did all it could do, but it was hamstrung by now-limited financial resources. One positive action taken was to hire a new man, Brigadier Charles Maple, whose job it was to ensure all quality was as tight as it could be.

Because the Princess failed so spectacularly and so publicly, it was all the easier for Maple to get down to work and make his presence felt; to act as an effective quality overlord.

Like the ADO17 before it – and the Austin Montego after it – this initial unreliability had predictable effects on consumer confidence in the Princess. People did not buy the Princess in large numbers; the sales never lived up to the expectations that British Leyland management had for it, but unlike the ADO17, which BMC left pretty much untouched for the duration of the production run, the Princess was the subject of a programme of continuous development.

Continuous development

One happy side-effect of the creation of the Princess marque was simplifying the production variations. Now that there was not the plethora of Austin, Morris and Wolseley models to contend with, the quality soon improved. According to one assembly line worker at Cowley: ‘The other problem was the product mix, i.e. low-line, medium-line and high-line trim levels.

‘This was on the Austin and Morris versions. Many wrong parts were fitted to the early cars just to make up the numbers for launch. Once the 18-22 Series was dropped and the Princess name came in and the trim levels went to low-line [L], high-line [HL] and high-line super [HLS], things improved no end.’

Interestingly, a run of 50 diesel-powered Princesses was produced during 1977, with the sole intent of recapturing the private-hire taxi market, which had been all but surrendered to Ford. Although these B-Series diesels were trialled across the country, the plan was soon dropped. The one contribution the Princess 1800D did make to the overall story of the car was the improved bulkhead insulation, which would find its way onto the Princess 2, improving refinement levels considerably.

Princess 2: the first facelift

In July 1978, the Princess 2 (above) appeared, sporting the long-overdue  O-Series engine, which was available in 1.7- and 2-litre forms to run alongside the existing 2227cc E6 power unit (the six cylinder would be phased out before the Ambassador was launched). Various running changes were also made to the Princess and, even though customers still found the car’s lack of pace a turn-off and its styling challenging, sales continued running at a reasonable, if unspectacular level. Due to this continuous tinkering by the backroom boys, the Princess did eventually come good even if sales in the UK took a dive in 1979 due to the Iranian crisis.

What Car? magazine tested the 2000HLS in 1980 and was quick to point out that the Princess had undergone a process of subtle improvements and did not hesitate recommending it (with reservations) against a couple of obscure rivals: ‘…to concentrate on the BL car’s faults – and it has all too many, still – would be to ignore its one overwhelming advantage, that of excellent passenger space and ride comfort, unrivalled at the price.

‘It may not be the most prestigious, attractive or advanced alternative available, but for the motorist who places practicality above speed and excitement it must be still the best bet.’

In conclusion…

Why the Princess failed was not because of its adventurous styling, its lack of a hatchback or even the fact that it was not fast enough; simply put, it failed because it had a lamentable record for unreliability, which once gained, could not be lost – no matter how hard they tried.

If Austin-Morris had built it well from the outset, the story may have been entirely different – but the same could equally be said for so many other cars produced by the company before and since.

  • Read on: Austin Ambassador development story
  • Back to: BMC 1800/2200 development story
This immaculate Princess demonstrates perfectly the fact that the wedge profile made the transition from styling exercise to production reality without any major changes - contrast that with the sad story of how the Allegro was corrupted by the production engineers. This late Princess sports a strident yellow colour that suits the car perfectly. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis, courtesy of Retro Cars magazine.)
This immaculate Princess demonstrates perfectly the fact that the wedge profile made the transition from styling exercise to production reality without any major changes – contrast that with the sad story of how the Allegro was corrupted by the Production Engineers. This late Princess sports a strident yellow colour that suits the car perfectly. (Picture supplied by Kevin Davis, courtesy of Retro Cars magazine)

Princess timeline

Year Month Details
1975 March 18-22 Series four-door saloon range introduced.

Available as Austin 1800, 1800 HL, 2200HL; Morris 1800, 1800HL, 2200HL; and Wolseley (2200cc) models.

1800 models have 1798cc four-cylinder overhead valve B-Series engine and optional power steering; 2200 models have 2227cc 6-cylinder overhead cam E-Series engine and standard power steering. 4-speed manual gearbox standard with three-speed Borg Warner (model 35) automatic transmission optional on all models.

All models share same unitary body shell with transverse engines, front wheel drive and Hydragas suspension. Austin versions with trapezoidal headlamps and low bonnet line; Morris and Wolseley versions with twin round headlamps, and humped bonnet and raised grille section (with illuminated badge on Wolseley). Standard instrumentation includes fuel and temperature gauges and seat belt warning lamp. Standard 1800 models (Austin and Morris) have vinyl trim, satin effect dashboard, heated rear window, multi-adjustable driver’s seat (240 positions) and inertia reel seat belts. HL models (Austin and Morris) have vinyl covered rear pillars, vinyl seats with cloth insets, satin effect dashboard, rear centre armrest, chrome embellishments (e.g. wheel arch extensions, window surrounds and wheel trims), centre console, clock and ammeter.

Wolseley models have full vinyl roof, velour seats with front centre armrests, front head restraints, wooden ‘canaletto’ dashboard, tinted glass, chrome front and rear screen surrounds, multi-adjustable front passenger seat (240 positions), fully carpeted boot with light, rear passenger compartment lamps, rear cigar lighter, push button MW/LW radio, velour roof lining and ‘hockey stick’ door grabs.

September Austin, Morris and Wolseley names dropped and range renamed Princess.

Range now Princess 1800, 1800 HL, 2200 HL and 2200 HLS.

Frontal styling as previous Austin models, with twin round headlamps (tungsten) on 1800cc versions and trapezoidal headlamps (quartz halogen) on 2200cc versions. New 2200 HLS derivative introduced to replace Wolseley models; trim and equipment as previous Wolseley.

1976 April HL models now have cloth (nylon) seats (previously optional on these models only).
1978 March Limited edition Special Six Automatic launched. Based on 2200 HL but fitted with HLS seats, wooden dash, rear courtesy lights and full length Webasto sunroof. Only available in Black and limited to 1200 units.
July Princess Series 2 models introduced.

New 1700cc and 2000cc (1695cc and 1993cc) 4-cylinder overhead cam O-Series engines replace 1800cc B-Series.

Revisions to all models include improved Hydragas suspension, Triplex 10/20 laminated windscreen, twin door mirrors in satin black, new style rear badges and a side indicator repeater lamp on each front wing. Model range now 1700L, 1700HL, 2000HL, 2200HL and 2200HLS. Dashboard insert now matt black on L models and wooden on HL.

1979 January 2200 HL discontinued.
May 1700HLS and 2000HLS introduced, with similar trim and equipment to 2200HLS (including trapezoidal headlamps). Power steering remains standard on 2200HLS and optional on all other models.
1980 March Radio standard throughout the range. Restyled warning lights. L models now have cropped nylon seat facings.
1981 February Revisions to all models include improved seats, reshaped controls, new front/rear badging (depicting engine size in litres rather than cc), larger door mirrors, revised control gear and better sound insulation. Doorframe surrounds now body colour on L models and matt black on HL and HLS. New coachlines below waistline now one stripe for L, two for HL and three for HLS. Alloy wheels now optional. L and HL have Marle fabric seat facings. HLS versions have power steering as standard on all engine sizes, restyled front seats and radio/stereo cassette player.
April 1.7 HLS discontinued.
November Princess range discontinued

 


Reviews, blogs and news stories

Princess (ADO71)

Gallery : Princess Countryman

31 July 2011 Keith Adams 6

If a hatcback would have improved the versatility of the Princess, just think what an estate version could have offered. Picture supplied by Chris Collin

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : November 2010

1 November 2010 Alexander Boucke 2

What makes a proper barn find? Lots of spiders and a thick layer of dust? Finding a gleaming car underneath it all? Or some rusty surprises? Kevin Davis came to […]

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : November 2009

1 November 2009 Keith Adams 2

There’s a lot of Wedge-love on AROnline, and we reckon that the most delicious examples of all are the original 18/22 Series models that only ran for a matter of […]

Car of the Month

Car of the year : May 2008

1 May 2008 Keith Adams 1

Although we didn’t fully appreciate it at the time, the Princess was the most exciting new car of 1975 – featuring a racy wedge-shaped profile and a super-spacious interior, it […]

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : July 2007

1 July 2007 Keith Adams 3

The evergreen wedge gets our collars hot this month, and there are few more worthy than this excellent example owned by Princess nut, Kevin Davis. Things can’t get much better […]

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : September 2005

1 September 2005 Keith Adams 4

Princesses have something of a fevered following among enthusiasts. None are more committed to the cause than Kevin Davis, who seems to be on a one man mission to raise […]

Opinion

Why we love the… Princess

17 August 2004 Keith Adams 0

John Capon spells out exactly what it is that makes the “Wedge” floats his boat. Imagine a young lad of ten. The year is 1975. The place Exeter (Summerland Street […]

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : February 2003

1 February 2003 Keith Adams 1

This top-of-the-range Princess 2200HLS belongs to Kevin Davis, who also owns the Rover BRM featured in November. Kevin describes the mint looking Princess: ‘It’s a 1980 2200HLS Auto finished on […]

Car of the Month

Car of the Month : May 2002

1 May 2002 Keith Adams 0

This top-of-the-range Princess 2200HLS belongs to John Capon, who also owns the Marina featured in March. It was purchased from a man who originally had it as his company car […]

Princess (ADO71)

Archive : 18-22 Series renamed Princess

11 September 1975 Keith Adams 2

The 18-22 Series is renamed Princess after just six months in production. […]

Archive

Archive : Strike halts 18/22 output at Cowley

5 July 1975 Keith Adams 0

By R. W. Shakespeare British Leyland’s latest labour problems worsened yesterday when production of the recently launched 18/22 car range at the big Cowley, Oxford, plant had to be stopped […]

Archive

Archive : BLMC distributors report strong demand for new 1800/2200

3 April 1975 Keith Adams 0

By Clifford Webb British Leyland distributors and dealers yesterday reported so much interest in the company’s new model 1800/2200 they are predicting that it will become the best selling large […]

ADO71 at launch
Archive

Archive : The ADO71 Austin/Morris/Wolseley 18-22 series is announced

26 March 1975 Keith Adams 1

DAILY MIRROR Sharp Wedge Is A Winner By Patrick Mennem British Leyland launch a wedge shaped attack on the highly competitive medium sized car market today. A new range of […]

Archive

Archive : Austin Morris explains its upmarket policy

14 February 1975 Keith Adams 0

By Clifford Webb British Leyland’s new “up-market” policy for selling Austin Morris cars was spelt out for the first time yesterday by Mr Keith Hopkins, managing director of the Austin […]

Posts navigation

« 1 2
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forgot

Have an account?

Register for this site!

Sign up now for the good stuff.

Lost Your Password?

Enter your username or email to reset your password.

Latest story

The typical English scrapyard of the 1980s
Memories

Memories : A scrapyard in England, 1991

24 June 2022 36

I can smell the dampness, the rust, the oil and other fluids oozing into the mud from here. It’s a grim and strangely fascinating sight, and one that was echoed […]

AROnline on Facebook

Most recent comments

  • Glenn Aylett on Memories : A scrapyard in England, 1991
  • Cliffr on Memories : A scrapyard in England, 1991
  • Paul on Concepts : Omni Supermini
  • Richardpd on Memories : A scrapyard in England, 1991
  • Glenn Aylett on Tested : Princess vs Granada vs Renault 20
  • Keith Squibb on Opinion : Why the antagonism towards JLR?
  • John Shuttleworth on Memories : A scrapyard in England, 1991
  • Graham on Tested : Princess vs Granada vs Renault 20
  • Paul H on Tested : Princess vs Granada vs Renault 20
  • cyclist on Tested : Princess vs Granada vs Renault 20

The AROnline writers

  • Keith Adams

    published 5367 articles

  • Clive Goldthorp

    published 644 articles

  • Mike Humble

    published 438 articles

  • Ian Nicholls

    published 148 articles

Archive (1959-2019)

Featured stories

Archive : Race row fears for new BL car launch

4 June 1984 0

Archive : Labour’s woes in the UK

26 February 1979 0

Carrozzeria designs : Zagato

25 June 2011 7
Zagato Better known for their work for marques such as Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Aston Martin [...]

All the cars I’ve owned : Škoda Estelle 120L

31 March 2012 51
In a driving career spanning 30 years and over 250+ cars, Keith Adams highlights some [...]

Blog : Plus ça change, MG Motor UK

16 August 2015 48

It must be a year since I’ve put pen to paper (vitually) about MG Motor UK, and I think my tone back then might have been careful optimism about the company’s chances once the MG GS comes on stream. One year on, it feels as though the wait for this interestingly-styled baby SUV is as long as ever, and we’re still notching up penny number sales in the UK. […]

  • About AROnline
  • Terms of use
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Commenting policy
  • Acceptable Use Policy
  • Contact us

AROnline © Keith Adams 2001-2022 - please refer to the 'Terms of use' pages.