AROnline
  • Home
    • Go to random page
  • Cars
    • Austin/Morris
      • Morris Minor
      • Austin A30/A35/A40
      • Austin FX4/FL2 Black cab
      • BMC 1100/1300
      • BMC 1800/2200
      • Austin 3 Litre
      • Austin Maxi
      • Austin Kimberley/Tasman (X6)
      • Austin Apache
      • Morris Marina
      • Leyland Sherpa
      • Leyland P76/P82
      • Austin Allegro
      • Austin-Morris Princess
      • Morris Ital
      • Austin Metro
      • Austin Ambassador
      • Austin Maestro
      • Austin Montego
    • Rover
      • Rover P5
      • Rover P6
      • Rover SD1
      • Rover 200 (SD3)
      • Rover 800 (XX/R17)
      • Rover 200/400 (R8)
      • Rover Metro/100 (R6)
      • Rover 600 (SK1)
      • Rover 200/25 (R3)
      • Rover 400/45 (HHR)
      • Rover 75 (R40)
      • Rover Streetwise
      • CityRover (RD10)
    • Jaguar
      • Mk2/S-type/420
      • MkX/420G
      • E-type
      • XJ6/XJ12 (XJ4)
      • XJ-S
      • XJ (XJ40)
      • XJ (X300/X308)
      • S-TYPE (X200)
      • X-TYPE (X400)
      • XJ (X350)
      • XK (X150)
      • XF (X250)
      • XJ (X351)
      • XF (X260)
      • F-Type (X152)
      • XE (X760)
      • F-Pace (X761)
      • i-Pace
    • Land Rover
      • Defender
      • Range Rover (Classic)
      • Discovery
      • Range Rover (P38A)
      • Freelander
      • Range Rover (L322)
      • Evoque
      • Range Rover (L405)
      • Range Rover Sport
      • Discovery Sport (L550)
      • Discovery 5
      • Range Rover Velar (L560)
    • MG
      • Midget
      • MGB/MGC
      • Austin/MG Metro (LC8)
      • Austin/MG Maestro (LC10)
      • MGF/TF
      • ZR
      • ZS
      • ZT
      • XPower SV
      • MG6
      • MG3
      • MG GS
    • Mini
      • Mini (ADO15)
      • Mini Cooper
      • Mini Clubman
      • MINI (R50/R56)
      • MINI (F56)
      • Countryman/Paceman
    • Triumph
      • Triumph Herald/Vitesse
      • Triumph Spitfire
      • 2000/2500
      • Triumph 1300/Toledo/Dolomite
      • TR6
      • Triumph Stag
      • Triumph TR7/TR8
      • Triumph Acclaim
    • Ford
      • Consul/Zephyr/Zodiac
      • Cortina
      • Escort
      • Capri
      • Ford Granada (1972-1985)
      • Fiesta
      • Sierra
      • Mondeo
    • Vauxhall
      • Viva
      • Victor
      • Chevette
      • Cavalier
      • Astra
    • Rootes/Chrysler/Talbot
      • Hillman Imp
      • Hillman Hunter
      • Hillman Avenger
      • Simca 1000
      • Simca 1100
      • Chrysler 160/180/2-Litre (C Car)
      • Chrysler Alpine/Talbot Solara
      • Chrysler Sunbeam
      • Chrysler Horizon
      • Matra Bagheera/Murena
      • Talbot Tagora
      • Talbot Samba
    • TVR
      • M-Series
      • TVR Tasmin
      • Griffith
    • ‘Other cars’
      • AC 3000ME
      • Alfa Romeo Alfasud
      • Argyll Turbo GT
      • Bond Equipe
      • DeLorean DMC-12
      • Enfield 8000 Electric
      • Lotus Esprit M70/X180
      • Matra-Simca Rancho
      • Midas
      • Nissan Qashqai
      • Reliant Scimitar
      • Sinclair C5
      • Trident Clipper
  • Reviews & Drives
    • Car Reviews
    • Drive Stories
    • Our Cars
      • Mike’s Rover 400
      • Mike’s Rover 416GSi
      • Mike’s Montego
      • Mike’s Rover 75
      • Mike’s Rover 214SLi
      • Mike’s 214GSi
      • Alexander’s Citroën XM
      • Alexander’s Rover 800
      • Keith’s Range Rover P38
      • Keith’s Freelander
      • Keith’s Rover 75
      • Keith’s Citroen Xantia Activa
      • Keith’s Citroen C6
      • Keith’s Polish Rover SD1
      • Keith’s Rover SD1 Vitesse
      • Keith’s Renault Avantime
    • Staples2Naples 2004
    • Staples2Naples 2005
    • Czech Wrecks 2008
    • RatRod 2011
  • News
    • All News
      • Jaguar Land Rover
      • MG Motor UK
      • MINI
    • All Events
    • MGR@10 Month
    • Rover SD1@ 40 Special
    • Geneva Motor Show
    • Archive
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
    • Your Cars
    • Best of AROnline
    • Videos
  • Facts & Figures
    • Mechanical marvels
      • Commercials
      • Buses
      • The bus section
      • Rail Projects
    • History Files
      • British Leyland – The Grand Illusion
      • British Motor Holdings – the joining of BMC and Jaguar
      • Evolution of the AR logo
      • The Road to Perdition
      • The Whole Story
      • Road vs Rail
      • Urban myths and old wives’ tales
      • Interviews and personalities
      • Production figures
      • Development codes
      • Project Drive
    • The converters
      • Avon Coachworks
      • Chris Humberstone
      • Crayford
      • Lynx Engineering
      • Mumford
      • Panther
      • Paul Banham Conversions
      • Rapport International
      • Startins/MacNeille
      • Tickford
      • William Towns
      • Wood & Pickett
      • Woodall Nicholson
    • Concepts & Prototypes
      • BMC, BL and ARG Concepts
      • Ford concepts
      • Jaguar concepts
      • Land Rover concepts
      • MG concepts
      • MINI concepts
      • Rover concepts
      • Sports car concepts
      • Supermini concepts
      • Vauxhall concepts
    • AROnline Overseas
      • Around the World
      • Also known as
      • Carrozzeria designs
      • Connections
    • People
      • Alec Issigonis
      • Spen King
      • George Turnbull
    • Galleries
      • In production
      • Museums
    • Resources
      • Buying Guides
      • BMC, Leyland and Rover engines
      • Press photos
    • The Ryder Report
  • Marques
    • Austin
    • Authi
    • Hillman
    • Hindustan Motors
    • Innocenti
    • Jaguar
    • Land Rover
    • MG
    • Morris
    • Riley
    • Rover
    • Standard
    • Standard Motor Products
    • Sterling
    • Triumph
    • Vanden Plas
    • Wolseley
  • Timeline

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Celebrated as one of BMC’s greatest white elephants, the Austin 3 Litre emerged the way it did because circumstance was not on its side. The Austin 3 Litre development story is one that’s packed with bad decisions, and even worse luck.

Here, AROnline tells you why…


Austin 3 Litre: Misunderstood luxury

The cars : Austin 3 Litre development history

The Austin 3 Litre was a commercial disaster. There is no other way of putting it. The thinking and ideology behind the creation of the 3 Litre was straightforward and worthy enough – there had been a continuing need for BMC to have a representative in the 3-litre class.

This was a marketing requirement for the company and in the UK, this market was split five ways between the Austin Westminster (and its badge engineered derivatives), the Vauxhall Cresta, Ford Executive, Rover P5/P5B and Humber Super Snipe. It was quite simply (Rover aside), a totally unremarkable bunch of cars built in order to satisfy a demand.

BMC’s offerings in the class were the C-Series engined Austin A110 Westminster, the Wolseley 6/99 and the Vanden Plas 3 Litre. Basically, they were 3-litre versions of the Farina saloons and as they were based on a saloon that had never covered itself in glory, it went as read that these cars were not the most inspiring cars on the market.

When BMC and Rolls-Royce collided…

Bentley Java prototype was developed using the Vanden Plas 3-litre as a basis - when the project was scrapped in 1962, its engine was used in the Vanden Plas 4-litre R, and its suspension founds its way into the ADO61.
Bentley Java prototype was developed using the Vanden Plas 3 Litre as a basis – when the project was scrapped in 1962, its engine was used in the Vanden Plas 4 Litre R, and its suspension founds its way into the ADO61.

However, during the early-to-mid 1960s, Rolls-Royce began to investigate the idea of moving downmarket into the market sector just above this, and began talks with BMC. The idea was that they could use the Vanden Plas 3 Litre as the basis for its own smaller car, thereby providing Rolls-Royce with the suitable basis for a downsized luxury car; BMC would also benefit from this work, because they would be able to call on much of Rolls-Royce’s work to benefit themselves and strengthen their own executive car offerings.

In 1961, work began in Crewe on the Bentley Java – an idea conceived through the need to develop a luxury saloon on a shoestring. Rolls-Royce used the Vanden Plas 3 Litre as a basis, but in place of the C-Series engine, they used the 4.0-litre 6-cylinder F-60 engine – a power unit derived from a previous Rolls-Royce and at one time earmarked for the aborted Bentley Burma.

Rolls-Royce management were still concerned about the effect on the marque’s prestigious reputation, by this move downmarket, and so, as a result, the Java was conceived as purely a Bentley model. Work on the Java continued apace, and by March 1962, the first running prototype hit the roads – basically a ‘cut and shut’ Vanden Plas 3 Litre with the F-60 engine now fitted (and it was this car that BMC later used as a test bed for the Vanden Plas 4 Litre R).

Giving the Java a little Crewe panache

Prototype of the Vanden Plas 4-litre R - the car that George Harriman insisted that BMC could sell 200-per-week of: the concept of the car was fundamentally sound, as was the Kingsbury developed interior and exterior restyle. Despite this, it failed to live up to Harriman's ambitious sales targets.
Prototype of the Vanden Plas 4 Litre R – the car that George Harriman insisted that BMC could sell 200-per-week of: the concept of the car was fundamentally sound, as was the Kingsbury developed interior and exterior restyle. Despite this, it failed to live up to Harriman’s ambitious sales targets.

The styling of the Java showed some variance from the Farina based Vanden Plas, but not nearly enough to disguise its origins completely. It has to be said that the styling was reasonably successful effort, with an imposing frontal treatment that reminded commentators of the Facel Vega FV from 1954.

By November 1962, the Java had been subject to second thoughts at Crewe and the project was cancelled. Once the Java was officially dead, the company released the F-60 engine to BMC, and the work undertaken on the Java would go on to benefit BMC. George Harriman was very keen on the concept – and pushed ahead with the development of the Vanden Plas version, the 4 Litre R, which would subsequently appear in 1964.

In fact, with the Vanden Plas 4 Litre R, BMC learned a lesson in humility because it was created specifically to fall into the company director part of the car market, but was priced just below the important £2000 purchase price tax break point.

Designing the tax-breaking luxury saloon

Any company car purchased that cost over this price was subject to a swingeing increase in taxable duty – and so, BMC thought they had pulled off a marketing masterstroke when they secured a supply of 3.9-litre Rolls Royce F-60 engines (called FB60 in the BMC application) for use in the car. Equipment levels were hiked massively and this car was expected to sell in comparatively large numbers – the Rolls-Royce link being seen by BMC is being a positive selling point.

Unfortunately, this plan was scuppered on one major point that overshadowed the upmarket image the car was supposed to convey. The problem with the 4 Litre R was that its all-alloy engine, was well known for having its roots in the military field – and although it was lighter than the C-Series engine, its origins were a subject that could not be shaken off.

Like its 3 Litre cousins, the relatively heavy engine made the balance of the car somewhat nose heavy, and as such, made its handling understeer-biased and steering cumbersome – acceptable perhaps in lower priced versions, but not so much in the range topping Vanden Plas.

Engine origins put off buyers

The driving experience was considered underwhelming by the press and the image of the car was completely undermined by the fact that most prospective buyers were all too well aware of the engine’s origins – in fact; a B40 version of the engine was used in the Austin Champ!

Sales were resultantly dismal and one would have thought that maybe the company would have learned an important lesson from this car.

But they did not. The psychological need for BMC to remain in the ‘director’s car’ market was such that they continued to press ahead with a new model in the sector, codenamed the ADO61. By the early sixties, the BMC Design Department was becoming increasingly dictated to by the accountants of the company and so, soon imposed their influence on the new car.

Using the Landcrab as the basis for a luxury car

The Bentley Bengal clay model: The doors from the ADO61 are clearly visible. The car would have used the suspension and 6-cylinder engine from the aborted Java proposal, but in fact did not get beyond the quarter-scale model seen here. However, that suspension system did eventually see the light of day - in the Austin 3-Litre.
The Bentley Bengal clay model: the doors from the ADO61 are clearly visible. The car would have used the suspension and 6-cylinder engine from the aborted Java proposal, but in fact did not get beyond the quarter-scale model seen here. However, that suspension system did eventually see the light of day – in the Austin 3 Litre

When BMC was in the early stages of the planning for the new car, the decision was made to use the entire centre section of the yet-to-be-launched ADO17, but with unique and elongated front and rear ends, styled with help from Farina.

In fact, during the development of the Java, Rolls-Royce also looked at developing a version of the ADO61 for their own use – the car, called the Bentley Bengal and Rolls-Royce Rangoon was quickly quashed by the company, but only after the decision was made to use the Java’s suspension and engine in it – something that BMC, again, found rather appealing. At this stage of development, this may have looked like a pleasing economy for both companies, but a questionable decision when one looks at the styling of the donor car.

Styling aside, the ADO61 was developed in a logical and predictable way. Unlike the previous three BMC-designed cars (Mini, ADO16 and ADO17), the new car would be entirely conventional in its engineering – there would be no room for unconventionally engineered cars in this most conservative of markets.

The C-Series engine plan<

Initially, the plan was for the C-Series unit to be used in the new car as it had already seen service in the Westminster/Wolseley 6/99, but in the interests of increased refinement, it was deemed necessary to redesign the power unit’s bottom-end internals – as it was also being planned to use the engine in the MGC (ADO52). Where a four-bearing crankshaft sufficed before, a new seven-bearing crank was installed.

The transmission of the ADO61 was four-speed and the driven wheels were the rear wheels, which was a retrograde step for BMC. By the time the car had reached an advanced stage in development and its design was set, the cost cutting measures that the accountants had put in place may as well have not been undertaken: commonality with other cars in the range was minimal apart from the most obvious sheet metal and so, economies of scale through component sharing were minimal.

Unlike the engine/gearbox set-up of the ADO61, the suspension system adopted for the car was rather less than conventional: Like the ADO16 and ADO17, Hydrolastic was the springing medium, used all round. However, unlike its smaller brothers, the rubber springs at the rear were separated from the Hydrolastic displacer units.

The Austin 3 Litre’s suspension system

The idea of this was to smooth the ride even further, which BMC managed with some aplomb – which partially explains its excellent ride quality, along with the ADO61’s much greater weight – but also because a change in the pickup-point of the connecting pipes into the displacer-chamber reduced the typical bounce to near zero (it should also be noted that this modification was later incorporated into the Austin Maxi‘s suspension setup).

The rear suspension used the now-familiar Hydrolastic spring and damper units, supplemented by a self-levelling facility. This height adjusting rear end was a system that was completely independent of the car’s main suspension set-up and in a nutshell, the height was, regulated via a set of hydraulic rams. The pressure output by these rams was regulated via valves that sensed the level of the car – lowering it if it is too high, raising it if it is too low.

An engine driven-pump powered the system, but as the system was regulating the ride height whether the engine was running or not – as long as there was residual pressure in the hydraulics. This was seen as a ‘must have’ by BMC, which saw that this small splash of ingenuity would set the car apart from its domestic rivals. It must be said that this philosophy of trying to offer something more advanced in the chassis department did result in a car blessed with superb ride quality.

An in-house development – 3 Litre Hydrolastic

Unlike the previous three BMC new cars, Alec Issigonis had no hand in the development of this car – in fact, Issigonis positively wanted nothing to do with the car. Ron Nicholls would head-up work on this car, but he had no involvement in the concept of the car. Whereas ADO15, 16 and 17 were the product of Issigonis more or less single-handedly, the ADO61 was the brainchild of George Harriman, himself – and the finer points of the design were hammered-out by the BMC Board and Rolls-Royce. Such muddled conception was the father of a rather confused big car.

Alex Moulton would be closely involved with the suspension, though. He bought one of the earliest cars – A 3 Litre de Luxe Automatic, registered MAM222F  –  evaluating Hydragas suspension set-up. The two images below, from Guy Vincent of The Dr Alex Moulton Archive,  show the car under development.

The first is on  Moulton’s test rig in October 1968 undergoing body shake tests as part of a project investigating body boom and harshness at 90mph. The second image is  at Keevil Airfield, Wiltshire, showing the car undergoing  ‘Clotoide’ tests with a fifth wheel  attached to the back of the vehicle.

Austin 3 Litre De Luxe MAM222F Moulton Developments Sept 1968 GV Austin 3 Litre Auto MAM222F Moulton Developments Testing at Keevil c1970-72 GV

1963: The Austin 3 Litre takes shape

It would appear that the first full-size prototype of the ADO61 was produced in 1963 (before even the ADO17 was launched) and what is very striking about this was that it looked almost identical to the Austin 3 Litre in its final production form.

The styling even at this early stage could only be described as imposing, but the obvious question of how the car would compare with the Austin 1800 was, it appears, left unuttered. As events transpired, it actually took four years from the appearance of the first prototype (below) to the car being unveiled to the world – events in the wider world of BMC had obviously overtaken the ill-fated ADO61.

Development appeared to drag on through the 1960s and, like all products from BMC before and afterwards, the press were well aware of the car’s existence long before any official announcement had been made. Interestingly, the launch of the car to the public was a long and drawn-out affair because its announcement to the press took place almost a year before the car actually went on sale – something Triumph were also guilty of with the 2000 in 1963.

Prototype from 1963 shows BMC's big-car thinking of that time. The shape is remarkably similar to the final version, launched five years later.
Prototype from 1963 shows BMC’s big-car thinking of that time. The shape is remarkably similar to the final version, launched five years later

Launching the Austin 3 Litre

The press launch took place at Longbridge in the lead-up to the 1967 Motor Show and, in a professional presentation given by Raymond Baxter (the then BMC/BMH Public Relations Officer), the event was set-up so that the new car would be presented at the end of the show, to be the climax of the event. Raymond Baxter did his utmost to build up an air of anticipation in the assembled journalists, but when the Austin 3 Litre was wheeled onto the stage, it was met with a ripple of polite applause followed by an embarrassed silence.

The trouble was, of course, that the Austin 3 Litre was so obviously ADO17-based that it practically begged for the inevitable question to be asked: what advantages did this car offer over its smaller counterpart?

It was not until the following year that the press would find out – an,d of course, the news was not good. The main trouble was that the obvious ugliness of the car was (for many) an insurmountable problem and those who could get past its looks found that the Austin 3 Litre had so many dynamic shortcomings that it was impossible to think of anything positive to say about the car.

What the papers said about the Austin 3 Litre

For a start, the testers knew that the new incarnation of the C-Series engine was not going to be a sparkler, when they found that in the MGC, it was lugubrious in the extreme. This was the case in the 3 Litre, only more so – because of the vast weight of the new car, it meant that the car suffered from the same engine maladies, such as its unwillingness to rev, but it also had an astonishing thirst for petrol, too.

However, the 3 Litre was also an extremely comfortable car to drive – and, if you could look beyond the breathless engine and thirst for fuel, there was little to touch it on ride quality. On that score alone, BMC did gain something from working with Rolls-Royce.

By the time the car was released in 1967, it would only be to a select few trusted customers (one hundred of them), who were chosen to run the car for the company on an extended trial. Between the time of the initial launch and this first tentative step towards a full launch, BMH had been taken over by Leyland – and there was a real feeling within the new management to proceed with the launch of the new car, if only to demonstrate very graphically just how much BMH had lost its way.

From launch to sale: one whole year

ADO61 version as presented to the press in 1967: Versions like these were run in small numbers before the official public launch in order to gauge public reaction. The headlights were described as 'television shaped headlamp units', but these unsightly items were dropped in favour of the original arrangement for the final production models.
ADO61 version as presented to the press in 1967: versions like these were run in small numbers before the official public launch in order to gauge public reaction. The headlights were described as ‘television shaped headlamp units’, but these unsightly items were dropped in favour of the original arrangement for the final production models

When the Austin 3 Litre finally went on full sale to the public in 1968, it was already an embarrassment to the company. As it was, customers avoided it in huge numbers – and those that did not and chose to go into their local Austin showroom, were practically obliged to ask those same embarrassing questions of the car as the press had done over a year before.

As for the car itself, the interior had a nice, traditional wood and leather feel to it, but because it shared the ADO17 centre section and had a large transmission tunnel, it actually offered less space than the smaller car. However, in terms of ride quality, the ADO61 did set new standards of compliancy in its class – all the development work, which had been undertaken on the French Routes Nationale, had paid off handsomely.

The family resemblance between the two cars is most evident in this shot. Identical centre sections give the game away, although the 3-litre's proportions are quite a bit more conventional than its smaller cousin. Only the overly-long bonnet really counts against the ADO61 - the boot treatment looks as though it always should have been there.
The family resemblance between the two cars is most evident in this shot. Identical centre sections give the game away, although the 3 Litre’s proportions are quite a bit more conventional than its smaller cousin. Only the overly-long bonnet really counts against the ADO61 – the boot treatment looks as though it always should have been there
The interior of the 3-Litre was a nice place to sit, and although the on-paper figures suggested that it was more cramped than the 1800, it offered different qualities at the front, thanks to its much improved driving position. Extensive use of wood and high quality furnishings were abound...
The interior of the 3 Litre was a nice place to sit and, although the on-paper figures suggested that it was more cramped than the 1800, it offered different qualities at the front, thanks to its much improved driving position. Extensive use of wood and high quality furnishings were abound…

Unfortunately, there were ergonomic problems as well, not least the dashboard, which offered up a rather mean looking strip speedometer which appeared to have been lifted straight from the ADO16 – not exactly the thing that someone spending over £1500 would be looking for as a desirable feature (to put it another way, in those pre-inflationary times, the Austin 3 Litre actually cost nearly 50 per cent more than the twin-carburettor Austin 1800S – a vastly better car).

After BLMC: a tale of disaster and strife

Of course, the Austin 3 Litre was an outmoded dinosaur – BMH knew that, Leyland certainly knew that – as did the customers. The car was a victim of its own ugliness, for sure, but not only that, but the 3-litre class as a whole was suffering under the two-pronged assault from the Leyland-produced Rover and Triumph 2000s.

Customers in a position to buy such cars as the ADO61 quite rightly looked at the vastly superior new 2-litre competition and drew the conclusion that this new breed of smaller ‘executive car’ would provide them with all their needs, without the extravagance of a 3-litre car.

After the merger, of 1968, BLMC quite rightly allowed the car to go into full-scale production – the tooling costs had to be justified, for a start. This is so, because they could justifiably say that the Austin 3 Litre is a prime example of why BMH so needed to be taken over by Leyland.

A car of uneven charms

As part of the ADO61 development programme, Vanden Plas produced their own version for presentation to the company's management in 1966. Styling was suitably modified (although the wrap-around rear window is a mixed success), but the project was axed following the 1968 merger with Leyland.
As part of the ADO61 development programme, Vanden Plas produced their own version for presentation to the company’s management in 1966. Styling was suitably modified (although the wrap-around rear window is a mixed success), but the project was axed following the 1968 merger with Leyland
Wolseley 3Litre: "...the best car we never made", according to BMC test drivers. This double-sided prototype demonstrates two different styling schemes, which could have clothed the Rover V8 engine - it looked interesting and would have made an interesting flagship for the BMC range. However, the existence of Jaguar, and then Rover and Triumph would make its production a luxury for the company. The return would not have justified the investment.
Wolseley 3 Litre: “…the best car we never made”, according to BMC test drivers. This double-sided prototype demonstrates two different styling schemes, which could have clothed the Rover V8 engine – it looked interesting and would have made an interesting flagship for the BMC range. However, the existence of Jaguar, and then Rover and Triumph, would make its production a luxury for the company. The return would not have justified the investment

Be that as it may, the 3 Litre was a car of uneven ability and, as a result, it possessed a great deal of character, a sentiment borne out by one former manager, who put it in these terms: ‘the 3 Litre had a lot of charm.’

He added: ‘Senior management at Longbridge (including one George Turnbull) hung on to theirs as long as they possibly could, to the despair of the Transport Manager. I loved driving them and all who rode in them liked them too. The V8-engined Wolseley was regarded by the test drivers as one of the best cars we never made, as it had better performance, economy and handling.’

…and added disaster

Once, the Austin 3 Litre slipped onto the market in late 1968, it sold disastrously – it never even reached the financial break-even point of 50 cars per week. In its three-year production run, a total of 9992 were produced and, such was the magnitude of its failure, that the planned Wolseley version was dropped because it would have sold in negligible numbers.

Some thought was given to the car’s development though, because plans were drawn up to install the ‘Rover’ V8 engine under the huge bonnet, but they were quickly shelved – the only prototype of note surviving was the V8-powered ADO61 that Harry Webster himself used.

Apparently, it would become a familiar sight in the Longbridge workshops, due to its propensity to break down on a regular basis. British Leyland never even contemplated replacing the car, but with Rover, Triumph and Jaguar in the stable following the merger, why would they need to?


Thanks to Alexander Boucke, Declan Berridge and ‘an insider’ for their contributions to this story.


Reviews, blogs and news stories

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

The cars : Austin 3 Litre (ADO61) development story

8 February 2019 Keith Adams 87

Celebrated as one of BMC’s greatest white elephants, the Austin 3 Litre emerged the way it did because circumstance was not on its side. The Austin 3 Litre development story […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Concepts and prototypes : The Wolseley 3 Litre prototype (1969-1970)

5 July 2020 Alexander Boucke 51

In 1969, Austin-Morris investigated ways to increase the appeal of the slow-selling Austin 3 Litre. This Wolseley 3 Litre prototype, as photographed at the Longbridge Elephant House in 1967, was […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Essay : BMC and BL – the strip speedo years

22 April 2020 Chris Cowin 48

Nothing says 1960s more than a strip speedo, something all the rage at the start of that decade. Chris Cowin takes a look at some cars associated with BMC and […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

In-house designs : The Vanden Plas proposals

5 October 2017 Declan Berridge 20

Vanden Plas designed and prototyped a number of interesting models that never made it into production. Declan Berridge tells their story. […]

AROnline News

Events : Report – BMC and Leyland Show 2017

6 July 2017 Alexander Boucke 5

The first weekend in July saw the return of the BMC and Leyland Show to the British Motor Museum in Gaydon. Having reached its fifth anniversary, the event can now safely […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Prototypes : Rolls-Royce/Bentley collaboration with BMC

4 December 2016 Declan Berridge 14

Rolls-Royce and Bentley worked with BMC on a number of short-lived prototypes based on the Austin 3 Litre and Vanden Plas 4 Litre R. Here are the best ones that never saw the light of day. […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Engines : C-Series

26 August 2011 Keith Adams 33

The C-Series engine was the shortest lived out of the triumvirate of BMC engines, and has since gained infamy for being the motive power behind of the MGC and Austin […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Gallery : Those doors

5 August 2011 Keith Adams 12

When the ADO17 was launched as the Austin 1800 in 1964, few people can have imagined that one of its defining features – its doors – would later appear on […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Crayford 3-Litre estate

5 August 2011 Keith Adams 4

Seen as a replacement for the discontinued Morris Oxford Traveller and Austin Cambridge Countryman, this behemoth offered seating for up to nine passengers, and a few examples still exist today. […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Car of the Month : September 2008

1 September 2008 Alexander Boucke 4

ALWAYS a rare car even when new, the chances of spotting a 3 Litre on the road these days are akin to enjoying a big win on the Lotto. This […]

Austin 3 Litre (ADO61)

Car of the Month : April 2002

1 April 2002 Keith Adams 0

A more obscure Car of The Month for April. This time, I thought I’d go for the charms of the big and imposing Austin 3-litre. That being the case, the […]

Archive

Archive : Austin 3 Litre road test

6 April 1970 Keith Adams 7

THE GUARDIAN AUSTIN’S ANACHRONISM Eric Dymock tests the Austin 3-litre Depending on your criteria for style, you may describe the Austin 3-litre as functional, or plain, or perhaps an architectural […]

Latest story

Citroen BX
Raise a glass to

Raise a glass to : 40 years of the Citroen BX

23 May 2022 0

‘Loves driving… hates garages’ they said about the Citroen BX when it was launched in the UK in 1983. And how right those clever ad people would prove to be. […]

AROnline on Facebook

Most recent comments

  • Chris Weeks on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • Chris Weeks on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • DillTheDog on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • Glenn Aylett on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • David Price on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • daveh on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • Jonathan Carling on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • Paul Bennett on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • KC on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts
  • Hilton D on Opinion : Range Rover (L460) first thoughts

The AROnline writers

  • Keith Adams

    published 5234 articles

  • Clive Goldthorp

    published 644 articles

  • Mike Humble

    published 437 articles

  • Ian Nicholls

    published 148 articles

Archive (1959-2019)

Featured stories

Archive : Night shift strike at car works

2 April 1960 0

Blog : Perkins – Breathing new life into old Land Rovers

14 August 2012 25

Our Cars : Mike’s Rover 75 – new boots and brakes bring new problems

18 February 2015 4
Mike Humble Well… what a past couple of weeks, I can tell you. There’s been [...]

More of the same

2 June 2009 4
Keith Adams Back in the UK after an intense night drive from Dresden… what fun [...]

Archive : BMC Pays Joe To Do Nothing

3 February 1964 0
DAILY MIRROR BMC Pay Joe To Do Nothing By William Daniels The only time car [...]
  • About AROnline
  • Terms of use
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Commenting policy
  • Acceptable Use Policy
  • Contact us

AROnline © Keith Adams 2001-2022 - please refer to the 'Terms of use' pages.