Work on a new MG sports car was a running theme within Austin Rover and the Rover from 1984 onwards. The success of the MG “M” models had kept the flame of the Octagon alive, but what people wanted – and what market researchers repeatedly told the company was that the public wanted – was a roadster. As can be seen in the Sportscar Projects gallery section of this site, the ill-fated AR6 formed the basis of a proposed new MG Midget. When this project failed, work began on the F16 (which evolved eventually into the MGF), a latter-day MGB. On the back of this ongoing work, the company also investigated a larger, 3.9-litre front-engined roadster, denoted the DR2/PR5.
The problem for the company was that although there was a definite demand for a new MG, it remained lower down on the company’s list of priorities than their mid-range family cars, which were, frankly, proving to be a disappointment in the marketplace. Not only that, but the company’s development resources were so limited that they could not afford to take the risk of backing a new convertible.
However, following the sale of Rover to BAe in 1988 – and the resulting calmer financial climate that ensued – management’s attitudes towards the new MG began to soften.
The launch of the Mazda Miata (MX5) in 1989 proved to be the decisive event that upped Rover’s commitment to producing and launching a new car – and by 1990, the company had committed their resources to the PR3 project that would eventually be launched as the MGF. Management, however, were caught with a problem: even though PR3 was an evolution of ongoing projects, its development cycle would still amount to at least four years’ worth of hard work (scheduled for a 1994/1995 introduction) – and the public were clamouring for a new MG rather sooner than that.
That is where Project Adder came into the equation:
Project Adder came about in the closing months of 1989, when following the successful re-introducion of the MGB bodyshell by British Motor Heritage, the idea was floated of building new cars using this shell as a starting point. Into 1990 and the idea rapidly began to gain momentum once the management had given the project its blessing, following further positive market research. The formation of Rover Special Products in early 1990 facilitated the “new” MGB’s development without compromising concurrent Rover saloon car projects.
The brief was clear – build a new MGB using as many in-house parts as possible and keeping within a budget of just £5 million.
As a result, the Heritage shell needed no structural modification – and the choice of engine was clear: after the DR2/PR5 concept was dropped in favour of PR3, it was decided sensibly that a similarly-powered MGB would use its engine (the 3.9-litre version of the “Rover” V8 engine) and occupy the DR2/PR5’s intended market slot.
And so it was: the Heritage shell was used, but new front and rear wings were fashioned a) to accomodate wider 1990s rubber and b) to give the car an appealing, curvaceous, wasp-waisted style. The new panels were produced by Abbey Panels and matched the overall high level of quality attained with the Heritage shell.
The new car was named the RV8 to denote its Rover engine – the “B” was dropped in order to appeal to new-age fans as well as the traditional MGB enthusiast.
Launched at the British Motor Show in 1992, the MG RV8 marked the welcome return of the MG roadster.
It did not prove to be the sales success in the UK that the company had hoped for, however. The barrier to sales in the UK could be put down to two factors: 1) its high purchase price, coupled with the fact that 1992 marked a recession in the UK and 2) TVR – the company produced cheaper, faster, more focused sports cars powered by the same engine.
Autocar‘s test verdict summed up the feelings that most people had about the RV8:
“The bottom line is, and Rover admits it, that the RV8 exists as much to be a status symbol as a car in which to enjoy driving. To us the RV8 is an anachronism, albeit a strangely likeable one. It is nowhere near as good a new car as a TVR or an old one as a Morgan but on the right day, in the right conditions, it is easy to enjoy and even fun to drive in an agricultural, vintage manner. If, however, you asked us to part with £25,440 for the pleasure of its company, we would regrettably have to decline.”
Be that as it may, MG was back – and the wait for the MGF would now prove to be a little less painful…