MacNeillie Rover 75s

The long and the short of how the 75 was stretched…

MacNeillie Regency

In 1999, the 800-based Regency gave way to a new version based on the Rover 75, again available in 6-door form and aimed primarily at the funeral trade, although it could also be ordered with full armour-plating and bomb-resistance for the protection of more vulnerable occupants.

Rover 75 Vanden Plas

The Spring of 2002 saw the announcement of an interesting new development: Rover were to revive the Vanden Plas badge on a long-wheelbase 75 saloon, which would be available to-order only. This conversion work was also carried out by MacNeillie, presumably on the strength of their experience in strecthing the 75, and the high quality of their work. The 75 Vanden Plas was based on the top-of-the-range 2.5-litre V6 Connoisseur, with an extra 200mm (around 8in) being added to its wheelbase and rear doors. As with the previous decade’s Rover 800 Vanden Plas (produced by Coleman Milne), this gave executive travellers ample leg-stretching room in the back, from where they could appreciate such thoughtful details as a pair of reading lights and a roof-mounted clock whose style echoed that of the example which could be found on the car’s dashboard. Buyers opting for this flagship version were required to pay a reasonable premium of around £4500 over the list price of the “standard” Connoisseur.

The MacNeillie-converted Rover 75 Vanden Plas: the extra 200mm incorporated into the rear doors does nothing to upset the car’s graceful lines. In fact, from this angle, one would be hard-pressed to distinguish the car from the standard 75.

The longer rear doors are a little more evident when the car is viewed from behind – but only just.

The already-sumptuous Connoisseur-specification interior was upgraded with a few extra luxury touches, although few of these are visible in this particular shot. The extra legroom afforded by the 200mm stretch can certainly be appreciated, though.

Keith Adams

Editor and creator AROnline at AROnline
Created in 2001 and built it up to become the world's foremost reference source for all things BMC, Leyland and Rover Group, before renaming it AROnline in 2007.

Is the Editor of the Parkers website and price guide, formerly editor of Classic Car Weekly, and launch editor/creator of Modern Classics magazine. Has contributed to various motoring titles including Octane, Practical Classics, Evo, Honest John, CAR magazine, Autocar, Pistonheads, Diesel Car, Practical Performance Car, Performance French Car, Car Mechanics, Jaguar World Monthly, MG Enthusiast, Modern MINI, Practical Classics, Fifth Gear Website, Radio 4, and the the Motoring Independent...

Likes 'conditionally challenged' motors and taking them on unfeasible adventures all across Europe.
Keith Adams

Latest posts by Keith Adams (see all)


  1. Could Rover have just redesigned the 75 so that the LWB length became its standard length in order to better compete with the 5-Series class?

  2. I’ve often thought this as well, the “Rover 95”. Then again I thought that adding a hatchback to the “standard 75” might have been easy and allowed the car to become a little more practical for the hatch man 🙂

    • Totally agree Paul Idon’t think they made enough use of the platform. they should have had the saloon, estate, and then hatchback and coupe 75. They would have sold well in my opinion.

  3. Never seen a 75 Vanden Plas, but from the description and images here it looks a very comfortable spacious car. At a glance, the extra length is not that apparent. Just goes to show how it could have been developed into more versions had things not turned out as they did in 2005.

    In my town on Tyneside, there is a 75 driving round that has the full depth square grille but wearing a Roewe badge… unusual combo.

Add to the debate: leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.