The new standard-bearer
Alick Dick, the chairman of Standard-Triumph laid down plans for the company’s next new small car. Codenamed Zobo, it was to replace the Standard 8 and 10 and was tasked with attracting younger buyers back into the fold. It was a tall order, but by taking the decision to move towards the Triumph marque name, it was eased considerably – but in the end, thanks to the combined efforts of a small team of gifted engineers and designers, a car emerged from Coventry that truly captured the hearts of a new generation of buyers.
However, as appealing as the final product was, when it emerged in 1959, there had been a few problems along the way. Development of the new model had been hampered along the way by the fact that Standard-Triumph’s bodywork supplier, Fisher & Ludlow, had been taken over by the BMC in 1953 – no longer would the company enjoy being able to design and plan new models without its significantly larger compatriot having prior knowledge of what was in store. Alick Dick was not surprised when BMC chairman Leonard Lord advised him that when existing contracts had expired, Fisher & Ludlow would no longer supply Standard-Triumph with car bodies. Rival, Pressed Steel, was then approached, but its order books were full – and that left small body builders whose production capacity was simply not large enough to cope with the demands placed upon them by building the new small Triumph.
The problem was solved by Standard Triumph’s chief engineer Harry Webster, who suggested that instead of using the monocoque construction originally planned, Zobo should have a separate chassis onto which would be fitted body panels manufactured by smaller body builders – it was a clever, but simple solution to a very real problem.
In addition to that, the rest of the technical package chose itself. Webster decided on an independent suspension setup for Zobo: a rear swing axle arrangement with transverse leaf springs, something that would cause problems for owners later on. The only other major component to worry about was the engine, and that was a 948cc power unit carried-over from the outgoing Standard 10.
All that remained was the styling. Walter Belgrove had been Triumph’s chief stylist since the 1920s, but had left the company in 1955, and the remaining members of the team were unable to come up with a suitable design. Harry Webster decided to investigate the idea of employing an outside stylist, and went to Italy to meet Giovanni Michelotti at his styling studio in Turin. Michelotti agreed to style Zobo, although the forward hinged bonnet and wing section was the work of the Triumph styling department. This was the start of a very productive relationship with Michelotti that would last into the 1970s. All that remained was a name for Zobo and it was christened Herald after Alick Dick’s boat.
A case of constant development
The development of the range soon ensured. In March 1960 the four-seater convertible was launched. Powered by a twin-carburettor version of the Herald’s 948cc engine, it was usefully quicker, and unsurprisingly, the up-gunned power unit found its way into the saloon in February 1961. That version was badged the Herald S and was subsequently billed by Triumph’s PR literature as an economy model.
model development didn’t stop there. In April 1961, Triumph unveiled the new Herald 1200 range, which comprised a saloon, coupe and convertible. The 948cc engine had been bored out to 1147cc , and that upped power to a very acceptable 40bhp. Top speed was now a Motorway friendly 75mph and the 0-60mph time was now measurable without the need to resort to a sundial. These new uprated Heralds featured a collapsible steering column, walnut veneer fascia and a heater/de-mister unit, making them rather easier to live with. In May 1961, the estate model was added, and five months later, front disc brakes were offered as an optional extra on all models.
In October 1962, Triumph unveiled the Spitfire. It was a lightweight development of the Herald, which ultimately outlasted its parent car by nine years – an impressive achievement. The final new Herald body variant was the much sought-after Courier van which also found its way on to the market in October 1962. However, it didn’t hang around long, being summoned for early execution two years later thanks to its low sales caused by its high price and less than commodious loading bay.
And still the developments of the Herald were rolled-out: The Herald 12/50 appeared in March 1963, but was only available in saloon form. The 1147cc engine was tweaked to produce 51bhp, and a new gearbox, front disc brakes, heater, windscreen washers and a new grille all came as standard on the car.
In October 1966 another Herald derivative appeared, the 1998cc Spitfire based GT6.
The 12/50 lasted in production until October 1967, when it was replaced by yet another upgraded version, the 13/60. The 13/60 used a four cylinder 1296cc overhead valve engine (shared with the Triumph 1300). Fitted with a Stromberg carburettor it produced a healthy 61bhp at 5000rpm, about the same as the 1980’s 1275cc BL A-Plus engine. Top speed was now up to just over 80mph. The 13/60 was available in saloon, convertible and estate versions, and all models featured a two-spoke steering wheel, a re-styled fascia with better sited controls, re-designed seats and increased legroom for rear seat passengers.
|Triumph Herald production figures|
|948cc (1959-1962)||76,860 (including Herald S)|
|948cc Convertible (1960-1961)||8262|
|1200 Saloon (1961-1970)||201,142|
|1200 Coupe (1961-1970)||5319|
|1200 Convertible (1961-1970)||43,295|
|1200 Estate (1961-1970)||39,819|
And now for the Vitesse
Triumph had continually improved the Herald to cater for all tastes, but it was evident from the earliest days, that the car was no ball of fire; and so in 1962 a re-engineered version appeared to cater for the more sporting motorist. This emerged as the Vitesse 1600.
The Vitesse shared its chassis with the Herald, albeit with reinforced components and suitably beefed-up and body construction. The engine was a new six-cylinder overhead valve unit, which would subsequently find a home in a number of other Triumphs. Another distinguishing feature over and above the Herald was the twin headlamp set-up, which were angled seductively, giving the higher-powered car an easily identifiable front-end. The Vitesse had a suitably lavish equipment list – standard front disc brakes put it near the head of the class, while the optional overdrive massively improved high speed cruising. Like its lower powered brethren, the Vitesse was available in both saloon and convertible forms. Top speed was now up to around 89mph, while the 0-60mph time was slashed to 17.5 seconds.
In 1966, the 1600 was replaced by the Vitesse 2-litre, which used the same 1998cc six cylinder engine used in the 2000 saloon and the GT6. The 95bhp engine was fitted with twin Stromberg carburettors, and was mated to a stronger gearbox. Improved brakes were fitted, and that finally turned the Vitesse into a highly capable car for all reasons. With the additional power on board, a top speed of 95mph was on the cards, while a positively sprightly 0-60mph time of 12.6 seconds meant it could keep up with far more expensive machinery.
The Vitesse Mk2 duly arrived in 1968, and that was further upgunned to 104bhp. Finally the Vitesse was a 100mph car… Most importantly, though, the rear suspension had been revised to improve handling and make cornering a far safer pass time.
|Triumph Vitesse production figures|
|1600 Saloon (1962-1966)||22,814|
|1600 Convertible (1962-1966)||8447|
|2-litre Mk1 saloon (1966-1968)||7328|
|2-litre Mk1 convertible (1966-1968)||3502|
|2-litre Mk2 saloon (1968-1971)||5649|
|2-litre Mk2 convertible (1968-1971)||3472|
The writing was on the wall for the Herald/Vitesse cars with the Dolomite waiting in the wings to replace them. First to go was the 1200 saloon in May 1970 followed by the 13/60 saloon in December. The convertible, estate and Vitesse met their end in May 1971.
In a sense the cars were obsolete when they were introduced in 1959, but somehow Triumph had turned project Zobo into a success, finding buyers when there were more technically advanced cars on the market. In a sense the 1960s was the high point of the Triumph marque and the onset of the 1970s would spell doom for the brand as the marque was dragged through one industrial dispute after another.
All production of the Herald and Vitesse cars ended in 1971, but not before they made their mark on British Leyland boss Sir Donald Stokes. The Leyland Group’s first experience of car making had been with Triumph – Harry Webster and his team had shown to the Leyland board that they could develop a popular mass market car and make a profit from it. The basic Herald platform had been continually improved to cater for customers needs and had evolved into the Vitesse, Spitfire and GT6, cars for which Triumph could charge a higher price and therefore make more profit on.
This compares with BMC, and its myriad platforms and factories. Is it any wonder that upon the formation of British Leyland in 1968, Sir Donald Stokes installed Harry Webster as technical director of the former BMC, Austin Morris and tried to radically change the approach to product development at Longbridge?