Review: A week with the Renault Fuego


I’ve been loaned a car I’ve always hankered after since I was knee-high to a grasshopper… a bright red Renault Fuego. Yes, I know this is and the only coupe the the company was responsible for when this Fuego rolled off the production line, was nothing more than a glint in Roy Axe’s eyes…

But you know how it is – they tell you that you should never meet your heroes, because it is bound to end in disappointment. Perhaps so, but that’s a cliche, and I don’t like such things – otherwise, why would I drive a Rover 75? I’m under 35, don’t you know.

So, the Fuego. I remember being so impressed the first time I saw one on the TV – it was black and shiny, and as the car danced across the desert to the tune of Vangelis, one couldn’t help notice the sexy details – mad looking alloy wheels, a wraparound rear window (just like a Porsche 924!), and that all important Eighties French car touch: yellow foglamps. Yumm. Strangely enough, it proved to be one of those cars that impressed everyone for about five minutes – and within a year of bursting onto the market, it had slipped back into motoring anonymity.

Despite that, my view on the car was coloured by how impressed I was when I first saw it, aged ten.

Back to reality…

When I first clapped eyes on this car, I was very disappointed – what looked so sexy in contemporary advertising managed to look rather like an amorphous blob in real life. And an under-wheeled one at that. I mean – look at it… 13-inch wheels for goodness sake. Still, if it looked more anodyne that I remembered, the proof in the pudding would be in the driving, surely?

Well, I must admit I couldn’t fault the thing. It rides and handles really well, in that safe predictable front wheel drive way so many cars of that era managed to do. Steering was heavy, at parking speed, but lightened up just enough to become manageable on my B-road thrash home. The brakes were good – firm and progressive – and the damping was seriously impressive for such an old car on its original shock absorbers… Okay, the 1647cc is a little weaker than desirable and left me wishing it had a turbo for some extra fun – but it wasn’t underpowered; standing up to the motorway thrash perfectly well.

One must also remember, it’s styled by the same man who brought us the Citroen SM. And that’s reason enough to love it…

So, an impressive steer? Well actually, no… So what was wrong with it, then? After a little deliberation, I realised that this car had absolutely no soul, and although the driving experience was largely positive, it was also completely forgettable. But think about that for a while – how can an inanimate object made from steel, plastic and glass manage to have character? Is it just romantic tosh dreamed up by us motoring hacks, desperate for an excuse to criticise an otherwise worthy car?

I don’t think so, but I guess if you don’t really get cars, you would never understand the concept of a characterful car… and you’d probably not be reading this, opting instead to only think about cars when you need to refill your Passat with diesel.

Still, I’m sure the rest of us petrolheads know what I mean.

And perhaps that is why I don’t get MGBs, finding them throbby, archaic and dull – I haven’t tuned into their character. Perhaps I need to run one side by side with the Fuego to fully understand.

Keith Adams


  1. You have to feel sorry for Renault. Ford & Vauxhall successfully make coupés out of their family saloons & when the former tries it, they fall flat on their face.

  2. Off course most cars only had 13″ dia wheels in those days. A neighbour in our street had a turquoise blue Fuego from new and it did look rather nice and “different” to a Capri / Cav Sportshatch. I still preferred the Sportshatch though!

  3. Prefer the looks of the later Argentine built Renault Fuego GTA Max, especially the body-coloured bumpers.

    Pity a proper higher-performance Fuego was never developed above the 1.6 Turbo, with the 2.0 Turbo engine and possibly optional 4WD system from the Renault 21.

  4. According to the Wikipedia it was designed Robert Opron who at Citroen designed the GS, SM & CX.

    It’s odd Renault didn’t turbocharge the larger engines, to cash in on their pioneering work with turbos in Formula 1 at the time.

    There was even a turbo diesel model but only made in LHD.

  5. The later Renault 21 Turbo with the 2.0l was insane car with very rapid acceleration shame they were very fragile from the experience I had with friends and family.

    Never been a fan of the Fuego though always thought it to be a bit bland.

  6. Was this guy based near Liverpool? was looking to buy one a red one of a guy up that way but I lost his contact details.

  7. Ah yes, the Fuego.I remember when a young guy joined the Estates dept. at a local hospital where my dad worked. He seemed a sound type and dad liked him, so he he had to have been OK. Newly qualified as an engineer and earning half-decent money after years an apprentice he bought a brand new Fuego. It was higher spec than the one in Keith’s story, a TS maybe? He hadn’t had it a year when dad told me it’s engine was lunched. He obviously thought as a new car it didn’t require the oil checking. And him an engineer!

  8. Istr the Fuego was the first car to have remote central locking, called Plip after the chap that invented it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.